The entry of carbon from sucrose into cellular metabolism in plants can potentially be catalyzed by either sucrose synthase (SUS) or invertase (INV). These 2 routes have different implications for cellular metabolism in general and for the production of key metabolites, including the cell-wall precursor UDPglucose. To examine the importance of these 2 routes of sucrose catabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.), we generated mutant plants that lack 4 of the 6 isoforms of SUS. These mutants (sus1/sus2/sus3/sus4 mutants) lack SUS activity in all cell types except the phloem. Surprisingly, the mutant plants are normal with respect to starch and sugar content, seed weight and lipid content, cellulose content, and cell-wall structure. Plants lacking the remaining 2 isoforms of SUS (sus5/sus6 mutants), which are expressed specifically in the phloem, have reduced amounts of callose in the sieve plates of the sieve elements. To discover whether sucrose catabolism in Arabidopsis requires INVs rather than SUSs, we further generated plants deficient in 2 closely related isoforms of neutral INV predicted to be the main cytosolic forms in the root (cinv1/cinv2 mutants). The mutant plants have severely reduced growth rates. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of carbon supply to the nonphotosynthetic cells of plants. Most plant cells receive essentially all of their carbon as sucrose. Sucrose catabolism in plants is one of the largest metabolic fluxes on the planet, second only to fluxes in primary carbon assimilation. Only 2 enzymes can catalyze sucrose catabolism under physiological conditions: sucrose synthase (SUS) and invertase (INV); thus, most plant biomass is derived via 1 of these 2 routes. However, despite their central role in carbon partitioning and biomass accumulation, the precise roles and relative importance of these enzymes remain largely unknown.SUS and INV both occur as multiple, distinct isoforms. INV catalyzes the effectively irreversible hydrolysis of sucrose to glucose and fructose. Isoforms in the cell wall and vacuole (acid INV) differ in structure from those predicted to be in the cytosol, mitochondria and plastids (neutral/alkaline INV). SUS catalyzes the reversible conversion of sucrose to fructose and UDPglucose; SUS isoforms are believed to be cytosolic.Several lines of evidence indicate a predominant role for SUS in the entry of carbon into metabolism in nonphotosynthetic cells. Individual isoforms are needed for normal development in some plant organs, including potato tuber, pea and maize seed, tomato fruit, and cotton fibers (1-5). SUS is held to be important in determining sink strength, and in phloem loading (1, 6, 7). It is also proposed to have specific roles in cellulose synthesis, and in starch synthesis in leaves. In the widely cited model for cellulose synthesis, the substrate UDPglucose is channeled to the cellulose synthase complex in the plasma membrane via a SUS associated with the inner face of the complex (8, 9). Consistent with this idea, some SUS a...

). † These authors contributed equally to the work. SummaryThe properties and expression patterns of the six isoforms of sucrose synthase in Arabidopsis are described, and their functions are explored through analysis of T-DNA insertion mutants. The isoforms have generally similar kinetic properties. Although there is variation in sensitivity to substrate inhibition by fructose this is unlikely to be of major physiological significance. No two isoforms have the same spatial and temporal expression patterns. Some are highly expressed in specific locations, whereas others are more generally expressed. More than one isoform is expressed in all organs examined. Mutant plants lacking individual isoforms have no obvious growth phenotypes, and are not significantly different from wild-type plants in starch, sugar and cellulose content, seed weight or seed composition under the growth conditions employed. Double mutants lacking the pairs of similar isoforms sus2 and sus3, and sus5 and sus6, are also not significantly different in these respects from wild-type plants. These results are surprising in the light of the marked phenotypes observed when individual isoforms are eliminated in crop plants including pea, maize, potato and cotton. A sus1/sus4 double mutant grows normally in well-aerated conditions, but shows marked growth retardation and accumulation of sugars when roots are subjected to hypoxia. The sucrose synthase activity in roots of this mutant is 3% or less of wild-type activity. Thus under well-aerated conditions sucrose mobilization in the root can proceed almost entirely via invertases without obvious detriment to the plant, but under hypoxia there is a specific requirement for sucrose synthase activity.

One isoform of callose synthase, Glucan Synthase-Like7 (GSL7), is tightly coexpressed with two isoforms of sucrose synthase (SUS5 and SUS6) known to be confined to phloem sieve elements in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Investigation of the phenotype of gsl7 mutants of Arabidopsis revealed that the sieve plate pores of stems and roots lack the callose lining seen in wild-type plants. Callose synthesis in other tissues of the plant appears to be unaffected. Although gsl7 plants show only minor phenotypic alterations during vegetative growth, flowering stems are reduced in height and all floral parts are smaller than those of wild-type plants. Several lines of evidence suggest that the reduced growth of the inflorescence is a result of carbohydrate starvation. Levels of sucrose, hexoses, and starch are lower in the terminal bud clusters of gsl7 than in those of wild-type plants. Transcript levels of "starvation" genes expressed in response to low sugars are elevated in the terminal bud clusters of gsl7 plants, at the end of the night, and during an extended night. Pulse-chase experiments with 14 CO 2 show that transport of assimilate in the flowering stem is much slower in gsl7 mutants than in wild-type plants. We suggest that the callose lining of sieve plate pores is essential for normal phloem transport because it confers favorable flow characteristics on the pores.