South American subterranean rodents (Ctenomys aff. knighti), commonly known as tuco-tucos, display nocturnal, wheel-running behavior under light-dark (LD) conditions, and free-running periods >24 h in constant darkness (DD). However, several reports in the field suggested that a substantial amount of activity occurs during daylight hours, leading us to question whether circadian entrainment in the laboratory accurately reflects behavior in natural conditions. We compared circadian patterns of locomotor activity in DD of animals previously entrained to full laboratory LD cycles (LD12∶12) with those of animals that were trapped directly from the field. In both cases, activity onsets in DD immediately reflected the previous dark onset or sundown. Furthermore, freerunning periods upon release into DD were close to 24 h indicating aftereffects of prior entrainment, similarly in both conditions. No difference was detected in the phase of activity measured with and without access to a running wheel. However, when individuals were observed continuously during daylight hours in a semi-natural enclosure, they emerged above-ground on a daily basis. These day-time activities consisted of foraging and burrow maintenance, suggesting that the designation of this species as nocturnal might be inaccurate in the field. Our study of a solitary subterranean species suggests that the circadian clock is entrained similarly under field and laboratory conditions and that day-time activity expressed only in the field is required for foraging and may not be time-dictated by the circadian pacemaker.

Photoperiodism plays an important role in the synchronization of seasonal phenomena in various organisms. In mammals, photoperiod encoding is mediated by differential entrainment of the circadian system. The limits of daily light entrainment and photoperiodic time measurement can be verified in organisms that inhabit extreme photic environments, such as the subterranean. In this experimental study, we evaluated entrainment of circadian wheel-running rhythms in South American subterranean rodents, the Anillaco tuco-tucos ( Ctenomys aff. knighti), exposed to different artificial photoperiods, from extremely long to extremely short photophases (LD 21:3, LD 18:6, LD 15:9, LD 9:15, LD 6:18 and LD 3:21). Artificial photoperiods synchronized their activity/rest rhythms and clear differences occurred in (a) phase angles of entrainment relative to the LD cycle and (b) duration of the daily activity phase α. These photoperiod-dependent patterns of entrainment were similar to those reported for epigeous species. Release into constant darkness conditions revealed aftereffects of entrainment to different photoperiods, observed in α but not in the free-running period τ. We also verified if animals coming from summer and winter natural photoperiods entrained equally to the artificial photoperiods by evaluating their phase angle of entrainment, α and τ aftereffects. To this end, experimental animals were divided into “Matching” and “Mismatching” groups, based on whether the experimental photoperiod (short-day [L < 12 h] or long-day [L > 12 h]) matched or not the natural photoperiod to which they had been previously exposed. No significant differences were found in the phase angle of entrainment, α and τ aftereffects in each artificial photoperiod. Our results indicate that the circadian clocks of tuco-tucos are capable of photoperiodic time measurement despite their natural subterranean habits and that the final entrainment patterns achieved by the circadian clock do not depend on the photoperiodic history.

No abstract

No abstract