The release of glutamate during brain anoxia or ischaemia triggers the death of neurons, causing mental or physical handicap. The mechanism of glutamate release is controversial, however. Four release mechanisms have been postulated: vesicular release dependent on external calcium or Ca2+ released from intracellular stores; release through swelling-activated anion channels; an indomethacin-sensitive process in astrocytes; and reversed operation of glutamate transporters. Here we have mimicked severe ischaemia in hippocampal slices and monitored glutamate release as a receptor-gated current in the CA1 pyramidal cells that are killed preferentially in ischaemic hippocampus. Using blockers of the different release mechanisms, we demonstrate that glutamate release is largely by reversed operation of neuronal glutamate transporters, and that it plays a key role in generating the anoxic depolarization that abolishes information processing in the central nervous system a few minutes after the start of ischaemia. A mathematical model incorporating K+ channels, reversible uptake carriers and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor channels reproduces the main features of the response to ischaemia. Thus, transporter-mediated glutamate homeostasis fails dramatically in ischaemia: instead of removing extracellular glutamate to protect neurons, transporters release glutamate, triggering neuronal death.

Brain ischemia results from cardiac arrest, stroke or head trauma. These conditions can cause severe brain damage and are a leading cause of death and long-term disability. Neurons are far more susceptible to ischemic damage than neighboring astrocytes, but astrocytes have diverse and important functions in many aspects of ischemic brain damage. Here we review three main roles of astrocytes in ischemic brain damage. First, we consider astrocyte glycogen stores, which can defend the brain against hypoglycemic brain damage but may aggravate brain damage during ischemia due to enhanced lactic acidosis. Second, we review recent breakthroughs in understanding astrocytic mechanisms of transmitter release, particularly for those transmitters with known roles in ischemic brain damage: glutamate, D-serine, ATP and adenosine. Third, we discuss the role of gap-junctionally connected networks of astrocytes in mediating the spread of damaging molecules to healthy 'bystanders' during infarct expansion in stroke.

We show that information flow through the adult cerebellar cortex, from the mossy fiber input to the Purkinje cell output, is controlled by furosemide-sensitive, diazepam- and neurosteroid-insensitive GABA(A) receptors on granule cells, which are activated both tonically and by GABA spillover from synaptic release sites. Tonic activation of these receptors contributes a 3-fold larger mean inhibitory conductance than GABA released synaptically by high-frequency stimulation. Tonic and spillover inhibition reduce the fraction of granule cells activated by mossy fiber input, generating an increase of coding sparseness, which is predicted to improve the information storage capacity of the cerebellum.

Divergence and convergence of synaptic connections make a crucial contribution to the information processing capacity of the brain. Until recently, it was thought that transmitter released at a synapse affected only a specific postsynaptic cell. We show here that spillover of inhibitory transmitter at the Golgi to granule cell synapse produces significant cross-talk to non-postsynaptic cells, which is promoted both by the anatomical specialization of this glomerular synapse and by the presence of the high affinity alpha6 subunit-containing GABA(A) receptor in granule cells. Cross-talk is manifested as a novel slow rising and decaying small amplitude inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) that can also contribute a long-lasting component to more typical IPSCs, which is prolonged by inhibition of the neuronal GABA transporter GAT-1. Because of the long duration of IPSCs generated by spillover, the total charge carried is three times that of IPSCs generated by directly connected terminals. GABA spillover within the mossy fiber glomerulus may play an important role in regulating the number of granule cells active in the cerebellar cortex, a regulation that is suggested by theoretical models to optimize cerebellar information processing.

The relative distribution of the excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) between synaptic terminals and astroglia, and the importance of EAAT2 for the uptake into terminals is still unresolved. Here we have used antibodies to glutaraldehyde-fixed D-aspartate to identify electron microscopically the sites of D-aspartate accumulation in hippocampal slices. About 3/4 of all terminals in the stratum radiatum CA1 accumulated D-aspartate-immunoreactivity by an active dihydrokainate-sensitive mechanism which was absent in EAAT2 glutamate transporter knockout mice. These terminals were responsible for more than half of all D-aspartate uptake of external substrate in the slices. This is unexpected as EAAT2-immunoreactivity observed in intact brain tissue is mainly associated with astroglia. However, when examining synaptosomes and slice preparations where the extracellular space is larger than in perfusion fixed tissue, it was confirmed that most EAAT2 is in astroglia (about 80%). Neither D-aspartate uptake nor EAAT2 protein was detected in dendritic spines. About 6% of the EAAT2-immunoreactivity was detected in the plasma membrane of synaptic terminals (both within and outside of the synaptic cleft). Most of the remaining immunoreactivity (8%) was found in axons where it was distributed in a plasma membrane surface area several times larger than that of astroglia. This explains why the densities of neuronal EAAT2 are low despite high levels of mRNA in CA3 pyramidal cell bodies, but not why EAAT2 in terminals account for more than half of the uptake of exogenous substrate by hippocampal slice preparations. This and the relative amount of terminal versus glial uptake in the intact brain remain to be discovered. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptNeuroscience. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 11. Published in final edited form as:Neuroscience. Glutamate uptake into glia and neurons is essential for controlling the excitatory action of glutamate (for reviews see: Danbolt, 2001;Beart and O'Shea, 2007). It has been much debated whether the uptake activity of glutamatergic nerve terminals represents a major proportion of the total brain tissue uptake activity. The prevailing view is that most brain glutamate uptake is performed by astroglia, because (a) most of the glutamate uptake in forebrain tissue slices and synaptosome preparations is both dihydrokainate sensitive and dependent on the excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT) 2 (GLT1; slc1a2) gene and protein, and (b) the highest numbers of dihydrokainate sensitive EAAT2 glutamate transporters are found in glial cells (for review see: Danbolt, 2001). This view, however, does not take account of a substantial amount of data showing a significant uptake into glutamatergic nerve terminals (e.g. Beart, 1976; StormMathisen, 1977;Gundersen et al., 1993Gundersen et al., , 1996Suchak et al., 2003;Xu et al., 2003;Waagepetersen et al., 2005; for a detailed discussion about the existence of nerve terminal glutamate up-take, see section 4.2 in Danbolt, 20...