Objectives This paper describes characteristics of opioid use episodes for non-cancer pain and defines thresholds for the transition into Defacto Long-term Opioid Therapy. Methods CONSORT (CONsortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends) includes adult members of two health plans serving over one-percent of the U.S. population. Opioid use episodes beginning in 1997–2005 were classified as Acute, Episodic, Long-term/Lower Dose, or Long-term/Higher Dose. Results Defacto Long-term Opioid Therapy was defined by opioid use episodes lasting longer than 90 days with at least 10 prescriptions and/or at least 120 days supply dispensed. Long-term/Higher Dose episodes (<1.5% of all episodes) were characterized by daily or near daily use, a mean duration of about 1000 days, and an average daily dose of about 55 milligrams. They accounted for more than half the total morphine equivalents dispensed from 1997–2006. Short-acting, less potent opioids (e.g. hydrocodone with acetaminophen) were by far the most commonly prescribed medications for acute, episodic and long-term episodes. Long-acting (sustained-release) opioids were the predominately prescribed medication in a minority of long-term episodes (6–12%). Discussion Defacto Long-term Opioid Therapy was characterized by considerable diversity in medications, dosage, and frequency of use. Long-term opioid therapy may evolve from acute or episodic use in the absence of an agreed upon treatment plan. Defined thresholds for Defacto Long-term Opioid Therapy provide a possible check point for physicians and health plans to ensure that patients receiving opioid medications long-term are managed according to a treatment plan that is documented and monitored.

Objective To report trends and characteristics of long-term opioid use for non-cancer pain. Methods CONSORT (CONsortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends) includes adult enrollees of two health plans serving over one-percent of the US population. Using automated data, we constructed episodes of opioid use between 1997 and 2005. We estimated age-sex standardized rates of opioid use episodes beginning in each year (incident) and on-going in each year (prevalent), and the percent change in rates annualized (PCA) over the 9 year period. Long-term episodes were defined as > 90 days with 120+ days supply or 10+ opioid prescriptions in a given year. Results Over the study period, incident long-term use increased from 8.5 to 12.1 per 1,000 at Group Health (GH) (6.0% PCA), and 6.3 to 8.6 per 1,000 at Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC) (5.5% PCA). Prevalent long-term use doubled from 23.9 to 46.8 per 1,000 at GH (8.5% PCA), and 21.5 to 39.2 per 1,000 at KPNC (8.1% PCA). Non-Schedule II opioids were the most commonly used opioid among patients engaged in long-term opioid therapy, particularly at KPNC. Long-term use of Schedule II opioids also increased substantially at both health plans. Among prevalent long-term users in 2005, 28.6% at GH and 30.2% at KPNC were also regular users of sedative hypnotics. Conclusion Long-term opioid therapy for non-cancer pain is increasingly prevalent, but the benefits and risks associated with such therapy are inadequately understood. Concurrent use of opioids and sedative-hypnotics was unexpectedly common and deserves further study.

Objectives We describe age and gender trends in long-term use of prescribed opioids for chronic noncancer pain in 2 large health plans. Methods Age- and gender-standardized incident (beginning in each year) and prevalent (ongoing) opioid use episodes were estimated with automated health care data from 1997 to 2005. Profiles of opioid use in 2005 by age and gender were also compared. Results From 1997 to 2005, age–gender groups exhibited a total percentage increase ranging from 16% to 87% for incident long-term opioid use and from 61% to 135% for prevalent long-term opioid use. Women had higher opioid use than did men. Older women had the highest prevalence of long-term opioid use (8%–9% in 2005). Concurrent use of sedative-hypnotic drugs and opioids was common, particularly among women. Conclusions Risks and benefits of long-term opioid use are poorly understood, particularly among older adults. Increased surveillance of the safety of long-term opioid use is needed in community practice settings.

No abstract