Industrial revolution 4.0 offers both opportunities and challenges to all countries, including Indonesia. Personal data protection is necessary to encourage digital innovation. The existing regulation relating to personal data in Indonesia does not give sufficient protection especially with regard to the use of artificial intelligence and therefore is inadequate to encourage digital economic development. This paper aims to explore the importance of strong data protection regulation in Indonesia. This normative legal research employs comparative approach. Comparative study was made upon the development of personal data protection regulation in China, South Korea and Singapore. The study shows that these countries provide good lesson for Indonesia to learn in developing personal data protection regulation.

Telecommunication advancement has become a central part of human life brought tight competition among cellular operators. On June 2016, there was a case of business competition between Telkomsel and Indosat (the big Three Cellular operators in Indonesia) that conduct monopoly practice and predatory pricing. In Indonesia, there are two Institutions that maintain business telecommunication and business competition namely Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) has mandated by Law number 36 of 1999 and Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) by Law Number 5 of 1999. The research aims to know how the government regulates on competition of cellular operator in Indonesia and to know the role of Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) and Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) to settle the cases on competition of cellular operator (Telkomsel and Indosat cases). The study is normative legal research with statute and case approach, by using juridical qualitative approach. The results of this research are, firstly the analysis of regulation regarding on competition of cellular operator. Secondly the analysis of the role of Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) and Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) to settle the cases on competition of cellular operator (Telkomsel and Indosat cases) that conduct monopoly practice and predatory pricing, regarding with Law Number 36 of 1999 on Telecommunication and Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practice and Unfair Business Competition.

The paper responds on critical aspects between Indonesian Foreign Direct Investment Regulation (FDI) Act and China Foreign Investment Laws (FIL). China is relatively more developed, socially and economically over other countries, as viewed by scholars and foreign investors as an ideal place for foreign direct investment, partly due to its well-educated population, low labor costs, natural resources, and the adoption of an open-door policy. China have made remarkable FDI accomplishment through their own ways. Meanwhile, Indonesia is using an omnibus legislative strategy to entice foreign investors to invest in the country by modifying 74 FDI regulations. The study took a comparative approach to normative legal research. In addition, the goal of this study is to introduce the FDI legal model to Indonesia. And explores the debate issue on whether creating the omnibus law is a contradiction to Indonesian legal system. Moreover, intends to conclude by arguing that Indonesia should reconsider the omnibus law approach and refer to the lesson from the experience of China and Singapore.

There are various number of foreigners owned a property business in Indonesia which is then rented out. But in reality, there are still many parties who violate the lease, namely by way of leasing transactions carried out at foreign banks. So that the tax issued can be lower than it should be. The purpose of this study is to determine how the tax provisions for foreigners on rental property ownership in Indonesia and how the crime of tax evasion. From the point of view of criminal law, this is a violation of tax evasion which is regulated in the KUP Law, articles 38-40. The method used in this research is normative juridical which examines the normative aspects of legislation, namely legal research conducted by examining primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. In the implementation of taxes, there are many obstacles in the form of violations and tax evasion. In taxation, foreign nationals are also subject to domestic and foreign taxes. In the event of tax evasion on house rent by a foreigner, it can be criminally processed as regulated in the KUP Law articles 38-40.

The community service program aims to assist in making the legality of business licenses with the Home Industry Food Production Certificate (SPP-IRT) for Cistik Sofia processed. For most of the people in Kalitengah Hamlet, Glagahombo Village, Tegalrejo District, Magelang Regency, currently many are starting to develop businesses in the field of processed snack products in the form of Cheesse Sticks. The processed food is used as an alternative business in improving the welfare of the residents. The program is carried out through assistance in the process of filing business legality stages. As for the implementation of this program, several stages of the SP-PIRT submission process have been carried out including filling out the application form, product laboratory testing, and sanitation testing.