Objective No studies have been done to examine factors that predict the outcome of bacterial peritonitis during peritoneal dialysis (PD), beyond the contribution of the organism causing the peritonitis, concurrent exit-site or tunnel infection, and abdominal catastrophes. Design In this study we examined several clinical and laboratory parameters that might predict the outcome of an episode of bacterial peritonitis. Between March 1995 and July 2000, we identified 399 episodes of bacterial peritonitis in 191 patients on dialysis. Results There were 260 episodes of gram-positive peritonitis, 99 episodes of gram-negative peritonitis, and 40 episodes of polymicrobial peritonitis. Gram-positive peritonitis had a significantly higher resolution rate than either polymicrobial peritonitis or gram-negative peritonitis. Staphylococcus aureus episodes had poorer resolution than other gram-positive infections. Nonpseudomonal peritonitis had a better outcome than Pseudomonas aeruginosa episodes. Among all the gram-negative infections, Serratia marcescens had the worst outcome. Episodes associated with a purulent exit site had poor outcome only on univariate analysis. For those peritonitis episodes in which the PD fluid cell count was > 100/μL for more than 5 days, the nonresolution rate was 45.6%, compared to a 4.2% nonresolution rate when the cell count returned to 100/μL or less in less than 5 days. Those patients that had a successful outcome had been on continuous ambulatory PD for a significantly shorter period of time than those patients that had nonresolution. The nonresolution rate for those patients that had been on PD for more than 2.4 years was 24.4%, compared to 16.5% for those that had been on PD for less than 2.4 years ( p = 0.05). Conclusion The duration of PD and the number of days the PD effluent cell count remained > 100/μL were the only factors that independently predicted the outcome of an episode of peritonitis. Caucasians seem to have a higher nonresolution (failure) rate compared to Blacks. Other variables, such as the number of peritonitis episodes before the episode in question, vancomycin-based initial empiric treatment, serum albumin level, total lymphocyte count and initial dialysate white blood cell count, age, sex, diabetes, previous renal transplantation, and the use of steroids did not affect the outcome of peritonitis.
This study reports our experience with permanent peritoneal catheters. From July 1983 until December 1997, 225 catheters were implanted surgically in 207 patients (120 males, 87 females) with mean age of 58 ± 16 years (range: 2 -82 years), and a mean duration of continuous peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) of 21.9 ± 21.3 months (range: 1 145 months). Two hundred and seventeen catheters were used in 199 patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and 8 catheters in 8 patients with end-stage heart failure resistant to medical therapy. One patient used 3 catheters and 16 patients used 2 catheters. The catheters used were: Tenckhoff, 2; Oreopoulos Zellerman-1 (OZ-1), 10; OZ-2, 205; and OZ-pediatric, 8. All catheters were implanted by the same surgical team, through a paramedian incision under local anesthesia. By life table analysis, the actuarial survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years were 97%, 92%, 87%, and 82% respectively for all catheters. The catheter-related complications were: 5 obstructions, 2 dislodgments, 13 dialysate leaks (6 early; 7 late), 90 exit-site/tunnel infections (in 56 patients), 2 cuff extrusions, and 37 hernias (in 31 patients). Eighteen catheters were replaced for persistent peritonitis (15 cases), dislodgment (1 case), obstruction (1 case), and accidental shortening (1 case). The total observation period was 4526 patient-months. The overall incidence of peritonitis was one episode per 15 patient-months, and of exit-site/tunnel infections was one episode per 50 patient-months, with a significant improvement during the last years. We conclude that OZ catheters implanted surgically through a paramedian incision have a very high survival rate and a low complication rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.