No abstract

No abstract

PURPOSE. Reactive and underfluorinated impurities are acknowledged as a source of cytotoxicity of perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs) used as blood substitutes. To determine whether this is also a relevant factor in retinal toxicity, we analyzed eight PFO batches associated with adverse ocular events. METHODS. (A)The amount of reactive and underflurinated impurities was analyzed by fluorideselective potentiometry and expressed as H-value. (B) Cytotoxicity of these batches was determined by an ISO 10993-5-compliant extractive test and compared to published data generated with a direct-contact method. (C) A toxic PFO batch (061014) was purified to remove reactive and underfluorinated impurities. (A) and (B) -measurements were repeated after that. (D) The dose dependence of the H-value and cytotoxicity was determined in a dilution experiment. RESULTS. (A)The batches revealed H-values ranging from 1.400 ppm to 4.500 ppm. (B) All batches induced cell growth inhibition; seven must be classified as cytotoxic. Findings from ISO-conform extractive and direct-contact methods showed no difference. (C) After all reactive and underfluorinated impurities in batch 061014 were removed, the H-value dropped to <10 ppm and cytotoxicity disappeared. (D) Cytotoxicity increases gradually as the H-value rises.CONCLUSIONS. The clinical relevance of the H-value as a safety parameter for PFO endotamponades could be proven. The H-value is a measure for reactive and underfluorinated impurities that cause toxicity of PFCLs and should be incorporated in each endotamponade specification with a limit of 10 ppm to prove the effectiveness of the ultra-purification required and ensure a safe product. Despite the fact that an (ISO)-standard literally is a ''standard'' only, which cannot cover all imaginable possibilities, the incorporation of the Hvalue determination into the relevant ISO standard has been initiated. If a thorough risk assessment results in risks that cannot be detected and/or managed by the effective standard, additional investigations have to be performed.

The use of PFO may have been a predisposing factor for the occurrence of sticky silicone oil. While the presence of silicone oil remnants on the retina did not cause lasting side effect, forceful attempts at removal can lead to complications.

No abstract