The aim: To study the combination of medical, legal, ethical principles and regulations in the field of transplantology, as one of the key problems of bioethics. Materials and methods: Formal-logical methods of analysis and synthesis allowed to reveal the content of the concepts that make up the subject of research, to classify them, as well as to formulate intermediate and general conclusions. The systematic method allowed to study the role and significance of human right to transplantation among other somatic human and civil rights and freedoms. Using the historical method, the doctrinal basis of the study was analyzed, and the main stages of the formation of human right to transplantation were identified. Conclusions: The level of modern development of the Institute of Transplantology depends primarily on the tolerance of the society itself regarding the concept of brain death. The actual normalization of the concept of death in one or another state determines the level of realization of the human right to organ and tissue transplantation. Regarding the reform of the current legislation in the field of transplantology, as one of the key problems of bioethics, first of all, moral principles should be taken into account (at the same time, today morality in its development is even slightly ahead of the development of international law, although progressive principles of legal regulation of transplantation processes have been distinguished at the international level ). Therefore, during the development of norms of both international and national law regarding transplantology, existing moral principles should be taken as a basis. At the same time, one should not forget that a necessary factor is the presentation of a number of issues for public discussion, as well as their discussion at scientific and practical conferences not only of doctors and lawyers, but also of theologians and philosophers.

The article analyzes issues related to the content of the right to information in the modern context, limitations of the right to information and responsibility for information in the modern globalized society. The realities of today's globalized world put another aspect of the issue of the right to information on the agenda. It is about limiting the right to information and responsibility for abusing freedom of information for the purpose of manipulating public opinion, and accordingly influencing the nature of social relations through it.    The outlined circle of certain problematic aspects of the realization of the right to information in modern conditions proves the obvious need for the systematization of national legislation in this area. A manifestation of this could be the adoption of the long-awaited Information Code of Ukraine. Talks about this code have been going on since 1995, when the National Agency for Informatization under the President of Ukraine initiated its development. As it seems to us, in this basic legal act in the information sphere, it is necessary to synchronize all normative legal acts in the information sphere, to bring them into line with today's requirements. In it, among other things, issues related to the clear establishment of the circle of modern subjects of information relations and their basic rights and obligations, the only principles that regulate these relations, should find their legal consolidation. Taking into account modern realities, it is necessary to modernize a number of terms in the information field, first of all, those related to the information space, such as information war, cybercrime, etc. All this, ultimately, will contribute to the practical implementation of the main purpose of the right to information - to expand the opportunities of each person to ensure his other subjective rights, and therefore to increase his confidence in his own abilities and the satisfaction of his interests, the interests of society and the state as a whole.