Biomass, production, and nutrient distribution of a pure Quercus variabilis Bl. stand (stand 1) and two mixed Q. variabilis -Q. mongolica Fisch. stands (stand 2 and 3) were investigated in central Korea. Stand 1 naturally occurred on a site with a southern aspect while stand 2 and stand 3 occurred on sites with a northern aspect. Total (overstory + understory vegetation) biomass (t ha -1 ) and annual production (t ha -1 year -1 ) were 137.8 and 11.1 for stand 1, 216.2 and 16.6 for stand 2, and 253.3 and 19.7 for stand 3. Nutrient contents (kg ha -1 ) in the vegetation were distributed as follows: K, N, Ca, Mg, Na, and P,, and were greatest in stand 3 followed by stand 2, and stand 1. Stand density influenced the differences in biomass, annual production and nutrient contents in the vegetation. Forest floor dry mass and N content (kg ha -1 ) were 13 400 and 169 for stand 1, 10 400 and 133 for stand 2, and 11 200 and 127 for stand 3. Total amounts of N, P and Na in the ecosystem were greatest in the upper 40 cm of mineral soil followed by the vegetation and forest floor. However, the vegetation contained a greater amount of K than the mineral soil. It appeared that microenvironments, such as, aspect influenced the distribution of natural oak species within a relatively small area and resulted in differences in biomass, production and nutrient distribution among the stands.
Biomass and production of two stands with Quercus variabilis Bl. as the dominant species (stands 1 and 3) and one with Q. mongolica Fisch. as the dominant species (stand 2) were investigated in southern Korea. Stands 1 and 3 naturally occurred on sites with southerly aspects while stand 2 naturally occurred on northerly aspects; stand ages were similar for the three stands (36-38 years old). Total above-and belowground biomass including understory vegetation (Mg ha À1 ) was 108.4 for stand 1, 115.6 for stand 2, and 132.0 for stand 3, respectively. Understory vegetation constituted 17.4% of the total biomass in stand 1 but only 3.7-4.5% in stand 2 and stand 3. Roots constituted 20.1-24.6% of the biomass of the overstory vegetation. Although stand 3 showed the highest total biomass, net production was highest in stand 2 at 12.6 (Mg ha À1 year À1 ); net production levels for stands 1 and 3 were 11.7 and 11.1 (Mg ha À1 year À1 ), respectively. It appeared that the differences in site conditions related to aspect influenced the distribution of naturally regenerated oak species within a relatively small area and resulted in differences in biomass and production among the stands.
According to the national railway network construction plan, Investment in railways has increased due to the need for environmentally friendly transportation, and the rail network is expanding throughout South Korea. Railway projects should be evaluated using strategic environmental impact assessments. In the “Guidelines for the Construction of Environment-friendly Railways”, seven priority headings that must be considered for railway projects are described. This guide notes that qualitative evaluation must be conducted during the survey process to reasonably predict impacts on the environment. However, quantitative evaluation with specific indicator values may also be necessary. In this study, independence analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to quantitatively evaluate railway environmental and ecological indicators. The results were used to develop a regression model reflecting seven indicators; biodiversity class, ecosystem type, vegetation conservation class, tree age class, ecological naturalness, presence of river ecosystems, and fragmented patch size. The fitness regression model showed 90.3% classification accuracy and the receiver operating curve (ROC) model fit was 88.6%. An environmental quality assessment map was prepared by classifying areas of environmental quality according to five grades. This is the first model for environmental and ecological evaluation of railway projects. Evaluation using the map showed that the railroad passes through areas with lower protection values compared to the results obtained using the national environmental evaluation map. Kappa analysis showed a low level of agreement between the two maps (kappa coefficient = 0.212). The results of this study can be applied to railway development project sites and may help to identify the best sites for the development of an environmentally friendly railway system.
Da n g s a nf o r e s t sa r et r a d i t i o n a lv i l l a g ef o r e s t swh i c hh a v eb e e ne s t a b l i s h e db yl o c a lr e s i d e n t s . Th e yr e p r e s e n tu n i q u ec u l t u r a ll a n d s c a p eo fKo r e awi t hah i s t o r yo fmo r et h a ns e v e r a lh u n d r e d y e a r s .I ti sn e c e s s a r yf o rac u l t u r a lc o n t e n t st oh a v el o c a l i t ya n dg l o b a l i t ys oa st or e p r e s e n t Ko r e a .Cu l t u r a lh e r i t a g ec a nr e t a i nt h e i rv a l u ewh e nt h e ya r ef u l l ys u s t a i n e dt h e i ra u t h e n t i c i t y a n d ma n a g e me n t s c h e me .Al t h o u g h ma n y Da n g s a n f o r e s t s h a v e b e e n o n t h e v e r g e o f d i s a p p e a r a n c e , t h ef o u rv i l l a g e si nS i n wo n -r i h a v er e t a i n e dDa n g s a nf o r e s t swi t hDa n g s a nr i t u a l . I n t h i ss t u d y ,ad e s i g n a t i o no f' Co n s e r v a t i o na r e ao fa g r i c u l t u r a ll a n d s c a p ee c o l o g y 'i n c l u d i n g Da n g s a nf o r e s t s ,Bi b of o r e s t s ,r i c ep a d d yf i e l d ,a n ds t r e a m i nS i n wo n -r iwa ss u g g e s t e d .Th i s ' Co n s e r v a t i o na r e ao fa g r i c u l t u r a ll a n d s c a p ee c o l o g y 'c a nb ed e v e l o p e dt ou n i q u eg l o c a lc u l t u r a l c o n t e n to fr u r a lKo r e a ,a n dwi l lc o n t r i b u t et oe n h a n c et h ev a l u eo ft h eDa n g s a nf o r e s t ' s ,a n d r e v i t a l i z a t i o no fr u r a lv i l l a g e s .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.