Existing transgenic RNAi resources in Drosophila melanogaster based on long double-stranded hairpin RNAs are powerful tools for functional studies, but they are ineffective in gene knockdown during oogenesis, an important model system for the study of many biological questions. We show that shRNAs, modeled on an endogenous microRNA, are extremely effective at silencing gene expression during oogenesis. We also describe our progress toward building a genome-wide shRNA resource.

To facilitate large-scale functional studies in Drosophila, the Drosophila Transgenic RNAi Project (TRiP) at Harvard Medical School (HMS) was established along with several goals: developing efficient vectors for RNAi that work in all tissues, generating a genome-scale collection of RNAi stocks with input from the community, distributing the lines as they are generated through existing stock centers, validating as many lines as possible using RT-qPCR and phenotypic analyses, and developing tools and web resources for identifying RNAi lines and retrieving existing information on their quality. With these goals in mind, here we describe in detail the various tools we developed and the status of the collection, which is currently composed of 11,491 lines and covering 71% of Drosophila genes. Data on the characterization of the lines either by RT-qPCR or phenotype is available on a dedicated website, the RNAi Stock Validation and Phenotypes Project (RSVP, http://www.flyrnai.org/RSVP.html), and stocks are available from three stock centers, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (United States), National Institute of Genetics (Japan), and TsingHua Fly Center (China). KEYWORDS RNAi; Drosophila; screens; phenotypes; functional genomics A striking finding from the genomic revolution and wholegenome sequencing is the amount of information missing on gene function. Although Drosophila is arguably the bestunderstood multicellular organism and a proven model system for human diseases, mutations mapped to specific genes with readily detectable phenotypes have been isolated for 15% of the .13919 annotated fly coding genes (http:// flybase.org/; FlyBase R6.06). The lack of information on the majority of genes (the "phenotype gap") suggests that researchers have been unable to either assay their roles experimentally and/or resolve issues of functional redundancy. In addition, some phenotypes may be only detected on specific diets and environments. Further, our understanding of the function of many genes for which we have some information is limited by pleiotropy, whereby an earlier function of the gene prevents analysis of later functions.The availability of in vivo RNAi has revolutionized the ability of Drosophila researchers to disrupt the activity of single genes with spatial and temporal resolution (Dietzl et al. 2007; see review by Perrimon et al. 2010), and thus address the phenotype gap. Motivated by the power of the approach and the needs of the community, three large-scale efforts, the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC, http:// stockcenter.vdrc.at/control/main), the National Institute of Genetics (NIG, http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/fly/nigfly/index.jsp), and the Drosophila Transgenic RNAi Project (TRiP) at Harvard Medical School (HMS) (http://www.flyrnai.org/TRiP-HOME. html) have over the years generated large numbers of RNAi lines that aim to cover all Drosophila genes. These resources are proving invaluable to address a myriad of questions in various biological and biomedical fields including but not limite...

Summary Stem cells possess the capacity to generate two cells of distinct fate upon division; one cell retaining stem cell identity and the other cell destined to differentiate. These cell fates are established by cell-type-specific genetic networks. To comprehensively identify components of these networks, we performed a large-scale RNAi screen in Drosophila female germline stem cells (GSCs) covering ~25% of the genome. The screen identified 366 genes that affect GSC maintenance, differentiation or other processes involved in oogenesis. Comparison of GSC regulators with neural stem cell self-renewal factors identifies common and cell-type-specific self-renewal genes. Importantly, we identify the histone methyltransferase Set1 as a GSC specific self-renewal factor. Loss of Set1 in neural stem cells does not affect cell fate decisions, suggesting a differential requirement of H3K4me3 in different stem cell lineages. Altogether, our study provides a resource that will help to further dissect the networks underlying stem cell self-renewal.

We previously reported a CRISPR-mediated knock-in strategy into introns of Drosophila genes, generating an attP-FRT-SA-T2A-GAL4-polyA-3XP3-EGFP-FRT-attP transgenic library for multiple uses (Lee et al., 2018a). The method relied on double stranded DNA (dsDNA) homology donors with ~1 kb homology arms. Here, we describe three new simpler ways to edit genes in flies. We create single stranded DNA (ssDNA) donors using PCR and add 100 nt of homology on each side of an integration cassette, followed by enzymatic removal of one strand. Using this method, we generated GFP-tagged proteins that mark organelles in S2 cells. We then describe two dsDNA methods using cheap synthesized donors flanked by 100 nt homology arms and gRNA target sites cloned into a plasmid. Upon injection, donor DNA (1 to 5 kb) is released from the plasmid by Cas9. The cassette integrates efficiently and precisely in vivo. The approach is fast, cheap, and scalable.