As a quantitative evaluation method, the ecological footprint analysis (EFA) method is a frontier topic in the field of sustainable development. Human production activities will inevitably produce certain consumption, including the occupation of natural resources, resource consumption and waste production, which will have a certain impact on the ecological environment.
This paper proposes to use the ecological footprint to inversely analyze the ecological environment and resource consumption, quantitatively convert the material consumption produced by human activities into the area of biological production land and compare it with the supply area of the study area. The EFA is used to reflect the changes in the indicators of regional sustainable development, and the regional sustainable development indicator system and analysis framework based on the ecosystem are constructed.
The experimental result shows that the proposed model can effectively divide the resource space and at the same time can measure the degree of resource transfer, which has important guidance for revealing the internal relationship between regional ecological footprint characteristics and regional development and evolution significance.
As a quantitative evaluation method, the ecological footprint analysis method (EFA) is a frontier topic in the field of sustainable development. Human production activities will inevitably produce certain consumption, including the occupation of natural resources, resource consumption and waste production, which will have a certain impact on the ecological environment. This paper proposes to use the ecological footprint to inversely analyze the ecological environment and resource consumption, quantitatively convert the material consumption produced by human activities into the area of biological production land, and compare it with the supply area of the study area. The ecological footprint analysis method is used to reflect the changes in the indicators of regional sustainable development, and the regional sustainable development indicator system and analysis framework based on the ecosystem are constructed. The experimental result shows that the proposed model can effectively divide the resource space, and at the same time can measure the degree of resource transfer, which has important guidance for revealing the internal relationship between regional ecological footprint characteristics and regional development and evolution. significance.
As a quantitative evaluation method, the ecological footprint theory analysis method (EFA) is a frontier subject in the field of sustainable development. The production activities of human beings will inevitably produce certain consumption, including the occupation of natural resources, consumption of W and the production of waste, which will have a certain impact on the ecological environment, just as one foot on the ground will leave footprints. On the other hand, the ecological environment itself will also provide a certain bearing capacity, supply human material consumption. The ecological footprint theory is to quantitatively convert the material consumption produced by human activities into the biological productive land area, and compare it with the supply area in the study area. Since Rees put forward the theory of ecological footprint, the development of ecological footprint model has gone from one-dimensional model to two-dimensional model, and from two-dimensional model to three-dimensional model. This paper reviews the evolution of ecological footprint model from four aspects: scientific problem, model connotation, interpretation ability and application direction, in order to cause new thinking on ecological footprint model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.