The initial experience with a nurse-driven mobility protocol suggests that the rate of patient ambulation in an adult ICU and IMCU during the first 72 hours of a hospital stay can be increased.
The functional recovery of a muscle target following nerve repair is inversely related to the denervation time: i.e., the longer the muscle denervation, the poorer the functional outcome following nerve reconstruction. The trophic and protective effects of sensory innervation to a motor nerve, following prolonged denervation (greater than 6 months), have been studied. Following proximal transection of the musculocutaneous nerve (MC) close to its C6 origin in 10 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, the severed nerve was coapted to supraclavicular purely sensory nerves originating from C3 and C4 (sensory protection [SP] group). In another 10 Sprague-Dawley rats, the transected MC nerve was not protected by coaptation to sensory nerves (control group). After prolonged denervation or "sensory protection" (6 months), the MC nerve was then coapted in both groups to the purely motor medial pectoral nerve. Behavioral testing (grooming test) was performed on a weekly basis during the reinnervation time, which lasted 4 weeks. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) favoring the SP group, were found at the second week of the reinnervation period, but not at the end of the experiment. Evaluation also included intraoperative electrical stimulation of the MC nerve, biceps muscle dry weights, motor endplate counts, and nerve axon counts of the MC nerve. The biceps muscle dry weights were statistically higher in the SP group, along with a trend for a higher number of motor endplates. No statistically significant difference was found in the nerve axon counts of the MC nerve between the two groups. Statistically better intraoperative electrical stimulation results were also encountered in the sensory protection group. An interpretation of the results favors the hypothesis that sensory reinnervation of a motor target may provide the necessary trophic environment to minimize muscle atrophy, until a motor donor nerve becomes available.
Direct nerve-to-muscle neurotization has been the subject of both clinical and experimental studies. In this study, the authors report a new animal model to test the regenerative properties of a nerve (musculocutaneous) implanted in a muscle (biceps). They also report the early effects of the application at the implantation site of exogenously administered Brain Derived Nerve Factor (BDNF) and of endogenously produced BDNF, via the administration of an adenoviral construct with a tissue-specific promotor for muscle cells (AdRSV), and containing the BDNF gene. Evaluation included behavioral testing (grooming test), electrical stimulation, Western blot analysis of the distal implanted nerve to determine the presence of locally produced BDNF, and motor end-plate staining of the biceps muscle. At the early time point of 1 week following the musculocutaneous nerve to biceps muscle implantation, there was no increased production of recombinant BDNF at the distal implanted musculocutaneous nerve, as assessed by Western blot analysis. Therefore, there was no significant difference in the behavioral evaluation of the animals at 1 week; the Terzis grooming test showed no statistical difference among groups, but a trend toward better function for the BDNF and the high-dose AdRSV-BDNF groups, compared to the control groups. There was also no difference in the histologic appearance and number of the motor end-plates at the implantation site, compared to the controls. The electrical stimulation of the MC nerve did not produce statistically significant results among the experimental groups. In this direct nerve to muscle neurotization model, the application of AdRSV-BDNF at 3 x 10 (9) pfu/ul did not show enhanced production of BDNF at 1 week.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.