No abstract

BackgroundOral presentations of clinical cases by medical students during medical rounds in hospital wards are a source of anxiety and little is known about how this anxiety can be alleviated. The objective of this study was to investigate whether video-based feedback of public oral presentations can reduce anxiety in 4th year medical students.MethodsMulticentre randomized study conducted in six intensive care units (ICU) and emergency departments (ED) in France over a 9-month period in 2012. One hundred and forty two 4th year medical students were randomized to two groups: intervention and control. Students in the intervention group were recorded while making an oral presentation of a patient during morning ward rounds, followed by video-based feedback. Students in the control group conducted presented classical oral presentations without being filmed and with no formal feedback. Anxiety levels during a public oral presentation were assessed using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S). The primary outcome was the difference in STAI-S scores between groups at the beginning and at the end of a 3-month ICU or ED internship.ResultsSeventy four students were randomized to the ‘video-based feedback’ group and 68 were randomized to the control group. In both groups, STAI-S scores were significantly lower after 3 months of internship. However, the reduction in STAI-S scores was significantly greater in the “video-based feedback” group than in controls (-9.2 ± 9.3 vs. –4.6 ± 8.2, p = 0.024. Compared to the control group, significantly fewer students with high-level anxiety were observed in the “video-based feedback” group after 3 months of internship (68 vs. 28%, p <0.001).ConclusionsCompared to “usual practice”, video-assisted oral feedback reduced anxiety and significantly decreased the proportion of students experiencing severe anxiety.

Total baseline cortisol measurement is accurate and sufficient to diagnose AI in brain-dead patients, even if albumin or corticosteroid-binding globulin concentrations are low.

Objective: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used as relievers for acute asthma and controllers for severe asthma. However, the relief offered by OCS is counterbalanced by adverse effects. We aimed to describe how patients perceive OCS treatment benefits and risks, and how this could affect their adherence to the treatment. Methods: Patients aged !18 years with asthma registered with Carenity, an online patient community, were invited to respond to a questionnaire containing 35 closed and 3 open questions to assess their asthma and perceptions of OCS. Results: 268/300 respondents were receiving or had received OCS for asthma (58 for longterm use and 107 for short-term use). The mean age at diagnosis was 21.3 years. 66% had uncontrolled asthma (GINA control score 3 or 4). Although 42% perceived OCS to be efficacious, 46% mentioned adverse effects. Respondents were mostly satisfied with OCS (median ¼ 7.0/10), particularly for efficacy (median ¼ 8.0/10). Respondents reported having strategies to avoid OCS, mainly because of adverse effects. 26% of respondents had previously reduced or stopped OCS; this proportion was 22% for short-term OCS users and 36% for long-term users. 15% of the respondents not receiving long-term OCS would take the treatment without doing anything else if long-term OCS were prescribed; 42% would seek an alternative treatment. Conclusions: OCS for asthma is perceived efficient but associated with adverse effects. Patients seek alternative treatment.