In the Execution and Bankruptcy Law, there is no general regulation that requires the temporary suspension of the proceedings as an injunction in the context of the resolution of a dispute regarding the prosecution law. Complaint is a means of cancellation of a enforcement action, and as a rule, there will be no result in terms of substantive law, since it is not possible to take a decision based on substantive law. As a rule, the complaint does not have the feature of stopping the direct follow-up. Because, by means of unjust and unfounded complaints, the follow-ups would be interrupted and the purpose of the forced execution would be lost. Requests for payment against follow-up, delay and postponement of execution based on limitation are beyond our scope of work. As a matter of fact, Article 36 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law will not be applied to the decisions of the enforcement court, unless there is a special provision in the Execution and Bankruptcy Law (97/14, 269 / c, 276/2 of the Enforcement and Bankrupttcy Law). Therefore, since applying for a legal action against the decisions of the enforcement court will not stop the execution proceedings other than the sale, we will İÇİNDEKİLER / CONTENTS
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.