Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly resistant to biotic and abiotic degradation and can withstand very high temperatures before breaking down. The storage of PFAS‐impacted water and sediments in a holding pond or stockpiled investigation or remedial action‐derived waste is occurring on an increasing number of sites. The most common PFAS water treatment options include granular‐activated carbon and resins and the most common soil treatment options have been primarily limited to excavation, offsite incineration, and, in some cases, soil stabilization. An increasing number of states across the United States are establishing part per trillion PFAS guidance levels for drinking water. Removing PFAS from soils removes PFAS source impacts to groundwater. In this study, volatilization of PFAS from soil treated using in situ thermal heating is evaluated as a treatment method to achieve a high degree of PFAS removal from soils. The evaluation of temperatures needed to achieve removal is described. To minimize vapor treatment required for PFAS thermal remediation, a scrubber was incorporated into the treatment train to transfer PFAS to the liquid phase in a concentrated, low‐volume solution. Vapor‐liquid equilibrium behavior and the extent of PFAS volatilization from impacted soil over a range of temperatures were evaluated. Results showed that heating soil to 350°C and 400°C reduces PFAS soil concentrations by 99.91% and 99.998%, respectively. It was also confirmed that sulfonate‐based PFAS generally required higher temperatures for volatilization to occur than carboxylate‐based PFAS.
Recent regulatory changes need more challenging treatment goals for 1,4-dioxane. However, significant treatment limitations exist in part due to the high solubility and low Henry's law constant of 1,4-dioxane. Two case studies are reported with substantial 1,4-dioxane concentration reductions through in situ thermal remediation via electrical resistance heating (ERH). Concentration reductions greater than 99.8 percent of 1,4-dioxane have been observed in the field using ERH. Concentrations of 1,4-dioxane in air and steam extracted by an ERH vapor recovery system have also been evaluated. Laboratory studies were conducted to further understand the mechanisms that enable ERH remediation of 1,4-dioxane. Vapor liquid equilibrium studies in water and soil were conducted and utilized to develop an ERH treatment cost model for 1,4-dioxane. Existing field data were correlated to the 1,4-dioxane treatment cost model. Field observations and laboratory testing indicate steam stripping that occurs through ERH remediation is an effective treatment method for 1,4-dioxane. c⃝ 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.