A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate changeAssessing global progress on human adaptation to climate change is an urgent priority. Although the literature on adaptation to climate change is rapidly expanding, little is known about the actual extent of implementation. We systematically screened >48,000 articles using machine learning methods and a global network of 126 researchers. Our synthesis of the resulting 1,682 articles presents a systematic and comprehensive global stocktake of implemented human adaptation to climate change. Documented adaptations were largely fragmented, local and incremental, with limited evidence of transformational adaptation and negligible evidence of risk reduction outcomes. We identify eight priorities for global adaptation research: assess the effectiveness of adaptation responses, enhance the understanding of limits to adaptation, enable individuals and civil society to adapt, include missing places, scholars and scholarship, understand private sector responses, improve methods for synthesizing different forms of evidence, assess the adaptation at different temperature thresholds, and improve the inclusion of timescale and the dynamics of responses.

An ever-growing body of evidence suggests that climate change is already impacting human and natural systems around the world. Global environmental assessments assessing this evidence, for example by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1 , face increasing challenges to appraise an exponentially growing literature 2 and diverse approaches to climate change attribution. Here we use the language representation model BERT to identify and classify studies on observed climate impacts, producing a machine-learning-assisted evidence map which provides the most comprehensive picture of the literature to date. We identify 100,724 (62,950 − 162,838) publications covering a broad range of impacts in human and natural systems across all continents. By combining our spatially resolved database with human-attributable changes in temperature and precipitation on the grid cell level, we infer that attributable climate change impacts may be occurring in regions encompassing 85% (80%) of the world's population (land area). Our results also reveal a substantial 'attribution gap' as robust evidence for attributable impacts is twice as prevalent in high income compared to low income countries. While substantial gaps remain on con dently establishing attributable climate impacts at the regional and sectoral level, our unique database illustrates the broad extent to which anthropogenic climate change may already be impacting natural systems and societies across the globe. MainThere is overwhelming evidence that the impacts of climate change are already being observed in human and natural systems 3 . These effects are emerging in a range of different systems and at different scales, covering a broad range of research elds from glaciology to agricultural science, and marine biology to migration and con ict research 1 . The evidence base for observed climate impacts is expanding 4 , and the wider climate literature is growing exponentially 5,6 . Systematic reviews and systematic maps offer structured ways to collectively identify and describe this evidence while maintaining transparency, attempting to ensure comprehensiveness and reduce bias 7 . However, their scope is often con ned to very speci c questions covering no more than dozens to hundreds of studies.In the climate science community, evidence-based assessments of observed climate change impacts are performed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1 . Since the rst Assessment Report (AR) of the IPCC in 1990, we estimate that the number of studies relevant to observed climate impacts published per year has increased by more than two orders of magnitude (Fig. 1a). Since the third AR, published in 2001, the number has increased ten-fold. This exponential growth in peer-reviewed scienti c publications on climate change 5,6 is already pushing manual expert assessments to their limits. To address this issue, recent work has investigated ways to handle big literature in sustainability science by scaling systematic review and map methods to large bodies ...

Constraints and limits to adaptation are critical to understanding the extent to which human and natural systems can successfully adapt to climate change. We conduct a systematic review of 1,682 academic studies on human adaptation responses to identify patterns in constraints and limits to adaptation for different regions, sectors, hazards, adaptation response types, and actors. Using definitions of constraints and limits provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), we find that most literature identifies constraints to adaptation but that there is limited literature focused on limits to adaptation. Central and South America and Small Islands generally report greater constraints and both hard and soft limits to adaptation. Technological, infrastructural, and ecosystem-based adaptation suggest more evidence of constraints and hard limits than other types of responses. Individuals and households face economic and socio-cultural constraints which also inhibit behavioral adaptation responses and may lead to limits. Finance, governance, institutional, and policy constraints are most prevalent globally. These findings provide early signposts for boundaries of human adaptation and are of high relevance for guiding proactive adaptation financing and governance from local to global scales.