This article explores the signal characteristics of gendered vitriol on the Interneta type of discourse marked by graphic threats of sexual violence, explicit ad hominem invective and unapologetic misogyny. Such 'e-bile' is proliferating in the cybersphere and is currently the subject of widespread international media coverage. Yet it receives little attention in scholarship. This is likely related to the fact that discourse of this type is metaphorically 'unspeakable', in that its hyperbolic profanity locates it well outside the norms of what is regarded as 'civil' discourse. My case, however, is that -despite the risk of causing offence -this discourse must not only be spoken of, but must be spoken of in its unexpurgated entirety. There is, I argue, no other way to adequately assay the nature of a communication mode whose misogynistic hostility has serious ethical and material implications, not least because it has become a lingua franca in many sectors of the cybersphere. Proceeding via unexpurgated ostension is also the best -arguably the only -way to begin mapping the blurry parameters of the discursive field of e-bile, and from there to conduct further inquiry into the ethical appraisal of putative online hostility, and the consideration of possible remedies.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract