Gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality. At the time of diagnosis, majority of the patients usually have unresectable or metastatic disease. The most common sites of metastases are the liver and the peritoneum, but in the advanced stages, there may be metastases to any region of the body. Bone marrow is an important metastatic site for solid tumors, and the prognosis in such cases is poor. In gastric cancer cases, bone marrow metastasis is usually observed in younger patients and in those with poorly differentiated tumors. Prognosis is worsened owing to the poor histomorphology as well as the occurrence of pancytopenia. The effect of standard chemotherapy is unknown, as survival is limited to a few weeks. This report aimed to evaluate 5 gastric cancer patients with bone marrow metastases to emphasize the importance of this condition.

Most data on prognostic factors for patients with high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (HGUPS) is obtained from analyses of soft tissue sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and their impact on outcomes specifically in patients diagnosed with HGUPS. In this multicenter trial, we retrospectively analyzed 112 patients who were diagnosed and treated at 12 different institutions in Turkey. We collected data concerning the patients, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. There were 69 males (61.6 %) and 43 females (38.4 %). Median age was 56 years (19-90). The most common anatomic site of tumor origin was the upper extremity. Pleomorphic variant was the predominant histological subtype. Median tumor size was 8.2 cm (0.6-30 cm). Tumors were mainly deeply seated (57.1 %). Fifty-seven patients (50.9 %) were stage II and the remainder were stage III at the time of diagnosis. Median follow-up was 30 months (2-160). The primary site of distant metastasis was the lung (73.5 %) and the second most common site was the liver (11.7 %). The 5-year overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival rates were 56.3, 53.4, and 67.2 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of II (p = 0.033), deep tumor location (p = 0.000), and development of distant metastasis (p = 0.004) were negatively correlated with overall survival, and perioperative radiotherapy and negative microscopic margins were significant factors for local control rates (p = 0.000 for each). Deep tumor location (p = 0.003) was the only adverse factor related to distant metastasis-free survival. Deep tumor location, ECOG performance score of II, and development of distant metastasis carry a poor prognostic implication on overall survival. These will aid clinicians in predicting survival and treatment decision.

Results: 72 patients were included: 52 received abemaciclib as first line, 20 as second line; in 49 patients abemaciclib was administer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor, in 23 with fulvestrant. 95.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse event. The most common was diarrhea (79.2%), mainly G1 (66.7% of cases). Other common toxicities were: neutropenia (56.9%), increased serum creatinine (38.9%), anemia (37.5%), nausea (34.7%), fatigue (23.6%) and hypertransaminasemia (22.2%). Toxicities were mainly low grade; 10.1% of adverse events where G3-4. 48.6% of patients required a temporary interruption of abemaciclib and 45.8% a dose reduction. All 17 patients aged 70 required a dose reduction. A concomitant palliative radiotherapy was administered in 16 patients: in all cases radiotherapy was regularly completed; a temporary interruption of abemaciclib was required in 3 patients due to hematologic toxicities. In patients with measurable disease, ORR was 55.7%, significantly higher in first line compared to second line (70.5% vs 17.7%, p<0.001). ORR was not significantly different between full and reduced dose (46.9% vs 65.5%, p¼0.143). At the time of the present analysis, 51 patients are still on therapy. Treatment discontinuations were due to disease progression in 17 patients, and to adverse events in 4 (G3 increased ALT in 1 patient and persistent G2-3 cutaneous toxicity in 3 patients).Conclusions: In a real-world population, abemaciclib was associated with a meaningful rate of objective response, with a favourable safety profile. Side effects were mostly low grade, manageable with temporary interruptions or dose reductions.Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors.

No abstract

No abstract