We have become aware that the figures and experimental data in the published article [...]

We wish to make the following correction to the published paper [1]. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. Reference1. Ellegård, K.; Palm, J. Who is behaving? Consequences for energy policy of concept confusion.

Peer review is an essential part of the publication process, ensuring that Energies maintains high-quality standards for its published papers [...]

The editors of Energies would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2016.We greatly appreciate the contribution of expert reviewers, which is crucial to the journal's editorial process. We aim to recognize reviewer contributions through several mechanisms, of which the annual publication of reviewer names is one. Reviewers receive a voucher entitling them to a discount on their next MDPI publication and can download a certificate of recognition directly from our submission system. Additionally, reviewers can sign up to the service Publons (https://publons.com) to receive recognition. Of course, in these initiatives we are careful not to compromise reviewer confidentiality. Many reviewers see their work as a voluntary and often unseen part of their role as researchers. We are grateful to the time reviewers donate to our journals and the contribution they make.If you are interested in becoming a reviewer for Energies, see the link at the bottom of the webpage

The editorial team greatly appreciates the reviewers who have dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal’s rigorous editorial process over the past 12 months[...]