Kecamatan Singosari adalah salah satu wilayah di Kabupaten Malang yang mempunyai angka perceraian tertinggi nomor dua di Kabupaten Malang. Penyebab terbanyak kasus perceraian menurut data dari Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang tahun 2015 adalah karena tidak harmonis lagi dan tidak tanggung jawab. Dari data tersebut, masyarakat kelurahan Candirenggo harus dibina dan didik dengan melakukan reformasi gaya berumah tangga bahwa tujuan berumah tangga selain membentuk keluarga bahagia, juga bertujuan lain, yaitu keluarga yang kekal. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian lapangan yang menggunakan metode wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi untuk memperoleh data berupa data primer dan data sekunder.  Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa gaya berumah tangga masyarakat Kelurahan Candirenggo Kecamatan Singosari Kabupaten Malang selama ini cukup variatif. Setidaknya ada tiga gaya berumah tangga. Pertama, keluarga terdidik, pasangan suami istri yang sama-sama berkarir. Tipe kedua adalah tipe keluarga yang menempatkan istri di rumah. Tipe ketiga adalah tipe bebas.  Kemudian perlu adanya reformasi gaya berumah tangga melalui model keluarga sakinah dalam mencegah perceraian di Kelurahan Candirenggo Kecamatan Singosari Kabupaten Malang yang dilakukan dengan beberapa tahap.

No abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced family functions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Indonesian families face three significant problems: distanced-family relations; neglected family education; and unequal socio-economic situation. This paper aims at explaining these three fundamental changes in family institutions. Besides, this paper identifies the factors that lead to family dysfunction. This article also offers concrete solutions to restore the lose of families function due to the COVID-19, i.e. the formation of a Family Corner. This research is a normative study using a critical, descriptive analysis method by presenting data from various literature and document sources. The latest data supported by several recent studies are described in detail in this paper. This research shows that post-pandemic family functions’ revitalization can be started by preparing a strong husband and wife’s emotional maturity.In addition, it is necessary to assist in communication and financial management of the family. Furthermore, revitalization will be successful if job opportunities are opened as widely as possible with incentive funds from the government and philanthropic institutions. Finally, the resolution and anticipation of natural disasters can be anticipated and resolved as quickly as possible. One of the effective ways for family revitalization is by establishing a Family Corner at each smallest unit of the society (Rukun Tetangga and Rukun Warga). Further research on this issue can be conducted through interviews with some informants who have experienced changes family lifestyle during the COVID-19 pandemic and mapping their hopes post pandemic period.

The Indonesian people still experience severe concerns about family stability because the COVID-19 pandemic has not stopped yet. The family burden is getting heavier every day. There has not been a comprehensive study of family instability related to COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to complement the shortcomings of previous writings by examining in detail the relationship between COVID-19 and family instability. This study is empirical research of family instability because it collects data from actors who experience family instability. The results of this study indicate that the problems caused by COVID-19 have not only resulted in the decline of the community's economy but have caused family instability in various ways, including social anxiety, unstable children's education, and an increase in the divorce rate. As shown in this paper, family instability cannot be resolved only with an approach of government power. However, it must also be overcome by a family counseling approach that touches the root of family problems. This research can be continued with a focus on studying the effects of COVID-19 on individuals using an anthropological approach.

AbstrakConstitutional Court's decision on the rights of children who were born out of wedlock causes various controversies. On the one hand, it is considered as a positive decision for children's benefit and their future. On the other hand, it is considered also as a negative decision by legalizing unregistered marriage. Using a field research and qualitative approach, this research produces a conclusion that four of respondents from different background of organizations agree with this constitutional court decision if the intended object is the children from Sirri (unregistered) marriage. Furthermore, one respondent agrees if this decision becomes a guideline and no longer a phenomenon. The most important message from informants is a recommendation that Constitutional Court not to issue another ambiguous fatwa and this institution is capable to make a humanist decision and remains in the corridors of the religious demands that have been rooted in the community.Keputusan mahkamah konstitusi tentang hak anak diluar nikah menimbulkan berbagai macam kontroversi. disatu pihak keputusan tersebut dianggap positif untuk kemaslahatan anak dan masa depan mereka, dan di lain pihak keputusan tersebut dianggap negative karena melegalkan pernikahan dibawah tangan. Dalam penelitian yang menggunakan jenis penelitian field research dengan pendekatan kualitatif ini menghasilkan suatu kesimpulan bahwa empat responden dengan latar belakang organisasi yang berbeda menyatakan setuju dengan keputusan MK tersebut jika yang dimaksud adalah anak hasil pernikahan sirri. Dan satu responden menyatakan setuju jika keputusan tersebut menjadi sebuah pedoman bukan lagi fenomenal. Pesan terpenting dari para informan adalah himbauan agar MK tak lagi mengeluarkan suatu fatwa yang ambigu dan mampu menciptakan keputusan yang humanis dan tetap dalam koridor tuntutan keagamaan yang telah mengakar di masyarakat.