Background-Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) is a well-established operative procedure. However, it is technically demanding and is therefore somewhat underused. We evaluated the clinical and angiographic outcome of patients undergoing a MIDCAB procedure with the Ventrica Magnetic Vascular Port (MVP®) system. Methods and Results-A Ventrica MVP® system was used in 10 of 11 selected MIDCAB patients. The system consists of 6 magnetic clips, with 3 clips forming a set. One magnetic clip set is positioned at the arteriotomy of the target artery and of the bypass graft using a preloaded delivery system. These ports then form an anastomosis by magnetic coupling. The mean age of the 10 patients (6 male) was 60.3Ϯ11.0 years. Three patients had an angiogram at the time of discharge and 8 returned for a 6-month angiogram. The total procedure time was 128.2Ϯ12.2 minutes. The mean anastomotic time was 199 seconds. The mean ischemic time during the anastomosis was 146Ϯ146 seconds. There were no in-hospital complications and no device-related adverse events. All 3 predischarge and all 8 6-month angiograms showed patent anastomoses. Conclusions-The magnetic vascular port facilitates the MIDCAB procedure significantly and reduces the ischemic time during the anastomosis. This minimally invasive procedure has the potential to be an alternative to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stenting in proximal left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis. It may expand the acceptance of hybrid procedures in which a left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-to-LAD graft optimally supplies the anterior wall and the septum while the circumflex and right coronary artery may be treated interventionally.

No abstract

Initial results indicate that the Converge Coupler can be used to create a safe and effective 30 degrees vein graft to coronary artery anastomosis under suitable conditions.

Biventricular pacing improves CI in patients with poor EF following cardiac surgery in the absence of preoperative atrioventricular- or interventricular conduction block. This benefit decreases with time after surgery as the QRS width returns to preoperative values. Four-chamber pacing did not confer additional benefit as compared to biventricular pacing in this series. Biventricular pacing should be considered as an adjunct in patients with critically low EF undergoing cardiac surgery.

No abstract