No abstract

The coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) is a viral illness with heterogenous clinical manifestations, ranging from mild symptoms to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and shock caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2. The global healthcare community is rapidly learning more about the effects of COVID‐19 on the cardiovascular system, as well as the strategies for management of infected patients with cardiovascular disease. There is minimal literature available surrounding the relationship between COVID‐19 infection and acute coronary syndrome. We describe the case of a woman who presented with an acute anterior ST‐elevation myocardial infarction managed by primary percutaneous coronary intervention, who subsequently developed severe COVID‐19 infection and ultimately succumbed to multisystem organ failure.

Background: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (cMRI) is the gold standard for right ventricular (RV) assessment due to its high spatial resolution. The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) recommends eight structural and six functional quantitative parameters for evaluation of the RV. This study sought to simplify echocardiographic RV assessment by examining the relative diagnostic value of the echo recommended parameters by applying them to cMRI imaging of the RV. Methods:We applied ASE recommended measures of RV size and function to 56 cMRI's and compared them to RV volumetric analysis obtained from cMRI. Pearsons' correlation coefficient was used to compare ASE prescribed parameters to corresponding cMRI calculated RV end diastolic volume (RVEDV) and RV ejection fraction (RVEF). The diagnostic performance of each parameter in predicting abnormal RV size or function was analyzed using receiver operator characteristic curves. Youden-J index was used to determine optimal sensitivity/specificity cut-points. Stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify measurements independently associated with RV size or RVEF.Results: RV end diastolic area (RVEDA) correlated best with RVEDV (r = .76, p < 0.001) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC) correlated best with RVEF (r = .7, p < 0.001). The best ASE parameter for identifying RV dilatation was RVEDA (Youden-J index = .84), the optimal cutoff was 32.3 cm 2 which yielded sensitivity/specificity of 84% and 100%, respectively. The best parameter for diagnosing RV dysfunction was RVFAC (Youden-J index = .52), with an optimal cutoff of 42% leading to sensitivity/specificity of 64% and 88%, respectively. Conclusion:The area based echocardiographic parameters for RV size and function, RVEDA and RV fractional area change outperform linear measurements in predicting RV dilation and RV systolic dysfunction. These parameters should be examined in further echocardiographic based studies as the primary parameters to guide quantitative RV assessment.

Transradial access for PCI (TRI) along with same day discharge (SDD) is associated with varying estimates of cost savings depending on the population studied, the clinical scenario and application to low-risk vs high-risk patients. A summary estimate of the true cost savings of TRI and SDD are unknown. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE®, CINAHL® and Google Scholar® databases for published studies on hospitalization costs of TRI and SDD. Primary outcome of interest in all included studies was the cost saving with TRI (or SDD), inflationcorrected US$ 2018 values using the medical consumer price index. For meta-analytic synthesis, we used Hedges' summary estimate (g) in a random-effects framework of the DerSimonian and Laird model, with inverse variance weights. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I 2 statistic. The cost savings of TRI from four US studies of 349,757 patients reported a consistent and significant cost saving associated with TRI after accounting for currency inflation, of US$ 992

No abstract