Purpose: Brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients use on-line groups for peer support, often seeking information from Facebook groups devoted to BPI. We hypothesized that a qualitative thematic analysis of posts from BPI Facebook groups would demonstrate the areas in which patients were seeking information regarding treatment of BPI and reveal potential sources of misinformation that patients may encounter. Methods: We identified the 2 most popular public Facebook groups for BPI by searching key words “traumatic brachial plexus injury.” We selected posts containing comments regarding BPI from November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019. We excluded posts regarding brachial plexus birth injury. We used iterative inductive and deductive thematic analysis for the qualitative data to identify recurring topics, knowledge gaps, potential roles of patient educational interventions, and patient interaction dynamics. Two investigators independently coded all posts and resolved discrepancies by discussion. Results: A total of 7,694 posts from 2 leading Facebook support groups were analyzed. Three themes emerged: (1) When discussing pain management, there was recurring anti-opioid sentiment. Posters who currently used opioids or supported those who did discussed perceived effects of the opioid epidemic on their treatment, on their relationships with care providers, and on availability of the medication. (2) Posters advocated for alternatives to traditional approaches to pain management, referring to prescribers as pill pushers and touting cannabinoids as a safer and more effective replacement. (3) There was strong anti-gabapentinoid sentiment owing to reported adverse effects and a perceived lack of efficacy, despite its role as a first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. Conclusions: Examination of posts from Facebook support groups for BPI revealed recurring themes, questions, misinformation, and opinions from posters with regard to treatment of neuropathic pain. These findings can help clinicians who care for BPI patients identify areas to focus on during patient encounters to address neuropathic pain that commonly occurs with BPI. Clinical relevance: Brachial plexus injury surgeons should be aware of information, misinformation, and opinions on social media, because these may influence patientesurgeon interactions.

Background: After traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI), the sudden loss of physical function is often accompanied by psychological distress. Given the complex nature and relative infrequency of the injury, BPI patients will often use online resources for information about their injury as well as emotional support. Questions/Purpose: Recognizing the influence of social media, we sought to search a popular social media platform to identify challenges faced by BPI patients and strategies used to overcome these challenges. Methods: We searched “traumatic brachial plexus injury” on Facebook and selected the 2 most popular BPI support groups. We collected posts regarding traumatic BPI from November 1, 2018 through November 1, 2019. We performed inductive and deductive thematic analysis of the posts to identify recurring topics, knowledge gaps, and peer interaction dynamics. Results: We analyzed 7694 posts from the 2 Facebook support groups. The following themes emerged: (1) BPI patients express discontent regarding the inability to use their arm and the slow or stagnant pace of recovery; (2) BPI patients are frustrated over their inability to retain their preinjury livelihood; and (3) BPI patients emphasize that acceptance and moving on are key components of adjustment to their condition. Some patients described the role of limb amputation in achieving these goals. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates the areas in which BPI patients are in need of emotional support. Adjustment to BPI might be facilitated through multidisciplinary care that addresses emotional aspects of recovery and emphasizes self-management skills, in addition to the traditional focus on physical function.

Background: The authors aimed to explore patients’ perioperative experience after trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition through semistructured patient interviews to identify deficiencies in preoperative patient counseling. Methods: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 14 patients who had undergone ligament reconstruction tendon interposition either 10 to 14 weeks or 9 to 12 months postoperatively at the time of their interview. The semistructured interview guide was developed by a fellowship-trained hand surgeon and a qualitative research specialist to discuss each patient’s perioperative experience. Inductive and deductive qualitative coding strategies were used to develop a codebook. All transcripts were then double-coded and discussed to develop recurrent major themes from the patient interviews. Results: The authors’ interviews identified three major themes discussed consistently on the patient perioperative experience. First, despite specific counseling about a 3- to 6-month postoperative rehabilitation period, patients were still surprised at the length of the recovery process in regaining function, range of motion, and strength. Second, patients repeatedly outlined that surgery on the dominant hand imparted specific limitations that made the postoperative course difficult. Third, patients discussed the importance of hand therapy both in rehabilitation and in guiding patient postoperative expectations. Conclusions: Preoperative counseling is of vital importance to set patient expectations in terms of overall expected outcomes, but also regarding early limitations, expectations, and overall recovery length. These themes have influenced how we counsel our patients about recovery after thumb carpometacarpal surgery and may help other surgeons identify areas for improvement in their discussions with patients.