Purpose: This study is to find out the legal arrangements for diversion and restorative justice in the juvenile justice system at the investigative level in order to realize child protection in the Riau Islands Regional Police, to find out the implementation of diversion and restorative justice in the juvenile justice system at the investigative level in order to realize child protection in the Riau Islands Regional Police and to Know the Constraints / Barriers and Solutions to diversion and restorative justice in the juvenile justice system at the investigative level in order to realize child protection in the Riau Islands Regional Police. Method: This research is normative legal research, supported by sociological/empirical research, using secondary data sources from library research to obtain a theoretical basis in the form of opinions or writings of experts, as well as to obtain information both in the form of formal provisions and data through official texts. Result: The formal criminal justice system which ultimately places children in prison status certainly brings considerable consequences in terms of child growth and development. The punishment process given to children in prisons does not succeed in making children deterrent and become better individuals to support their growth and development process, prisons often make children more skilled in committing crimes. Keywords: 1. Diversion 2. Investigation 3. Child Protection

This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of legal responsibility for marriage annulment in Decision Number: 245/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Btm. To find out and analyze Decision Number: 245/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Btm regarding legal liability for marriage annulment by the Religious Courts to strengthen legal certainty. This study uses a descriptive analytical research type method using an empirical juridical approach. The results of the study show that the implementation of legal responsibility for marriage annulment in Decision Number: 245/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Btm did not run optimally because the Respondent never attended the trial process and the Panel of Judges made a decision by granting the Petitioner's request with verstek, and declaring null and void The marriage of the Petitioner and Respondent was held on September 19 2020 before the Marriage Registrar of the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA). Analysis of Decision Number: 245/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Btm on legal responsibility for canceling marriages by the Religious Courts to confirm legal certainty, namely that the cancellation of marriages can be accounted for and realized to strengthen legal certainty. This is because the Petitioner in this case has fulfilled all the requirements specified for annulment of marriage. Apart from that, the annulment of the marriage which was granted by the Panel of Judges also provided a sense of justice for the Petitioner, who so far had the right to receive spiritual support but the Respondent as a married couple was unable to fulfill it. For this reason, it is recommended for couples who want to get married to be open to each other about each other's shortcomings. To parents to carefully consider every process of applying for an annulment of marriage, and try to maintain their children's household as best as possible and to the Panel of Judges to consider the decision as fair as possible and ensure the wishes of both parties

Permasalahan pilkada calon tunggal marak terjadi pada pelaksanaan pilkada tahun 2015. Hal ini dinilai dapat mengancam demokrasi daerah dalam hal pemilihan secara demokratis menurut UUD 1945. Oleh karena itu, permasalahan ini diselesaikan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan MK No. 100/PUU-XIII/2015 dan ditetapkan dengan UU No. 10 Tahun 2016. Merujuk pada kedua regulasi tersebut, calon tunggal dapat mengikuti pelaksanaan pilkada dengan mekanisme referendum. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan. Oleh karena itu bahan hukum yang digunakan mencakup bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier.

Purpose: The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the legal arrangements for the crime of counterfeiting money, and to know the analysis of the implementation of law enforcement against the crime of counterfeiting money. Method: The method used is a normative approach, namely through library research, and an empirical approach, namely through field research by conducting a series of interviews with respondents and informants to obtain field data. Result: The results of the study show that legal arrangements for the crime of counterfeiting money are regulated in the Currency Act and in the Criminal Code which explains that everyone, both individually and as a group, who counterfeits rupiah currency will be punished with imprisonment for a maximum of 10 (ten) years and a maximum fine of Rp. 10,000,000,000.00 (ten billion rupiah). In addition, based on the provisions of Article 244 of the Criminal Code, it is explained that anyone, either individually or as a group, who makes counterfeit money with the intention of circulating it will be subject to imprisonment for a maximum of fifteen years. Analysis of the implementation of law enforcement against the crime of counterfeiting money is still not optimal, especially with regard to the imposition of criminal sanctions which are still very low, so that the crime of counterfeiting currency is considered not a serious crime. This is possible because the proof is relatively easy. There has been a paradigm shift regarding currency, not just a means of payment, but money can be used as a tool for politics, economic colonization and so on.