The rate of living theory posits that higher metabolic rates negatively affect lifespan. This relationship would influence trade-offs among life history traits associated with energy production and allocation. These tradeoffs may also apply within a species, resulting in differences among individuals in life history traits. In this study, we use the bumble bee Bombus impatiens to test for a relationship between metabolic rate and lifespan. We measured the resting metabolic rates of workers throughout their lives and noted their lifespans in the laboratory. Our results show that (1) resting metabolic rate inversely correlated with potential lifespan and (2) resting metabolic rate was not affected by age. These results suggest that within a species, individual differences in life-history trade-offs may exist as predicted by the rate of living theory. metabolic rate / lifespan / aging / social insects / bumble bees Corresponding author: E. Kelemen,

Anthropogenic activities are rapidly changing the environment, and species that do not respond face a higher risk of extinction. Species may respond to environmental changes by modifying their behaviors, shifting their distributions, or changing their morphology. Recent morphological responses are often measured by changes in body size. Changes in body size are often attributed to climate change, but may instead be due to differences in available resources associated with changes in local land‐use. The effects of temperature and land‐use can be uncoupled in populations of the small carpenter bee Ceratina calcarata, which have experienced changes in agricultural and urban cover independent of climate change. We studied how the morphology of this bee has changed over the past 118 years (1902–2019) in relation to climate change and the past 45 years (1974–2019) in relation to agricultural and urban cover. Over this time, summer temperatures increased. We found that male and female size decreased with increasing temperature. Male size also decreased with agricultural expansion. Female size, however, increased with agricultural expansion. These results suggest that rising temperatures correlate with a decrease in female body size, while, opposite to predicted, agricultural land‐use may select for increased female body size. These opposing pressures act concurrently and may result in bee extirpation from agricultural habitats if selection for large sizes is unsustainable as temperatures continue to increase. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need to consider multiple environmental stressors when examining the effects of climate change due to their interactions.

No abstract

No abstract

Conserving bees are critical both ecologically and economically. Genetic tools are valuable for monitoring these vital pollinators since tracking these small, fast‐flying insects by traditional means is difficult. By surveying the current state of the literature, this review discusses how recent advances in landscape genetic and genomic research are elucidating how wild bees respond to anthropogenic threats. Current literature suggests that there may be geographic differences in the vulnerability of bee species to landscape changes. Populations of temperate bee species are becoming more isolated and more genetically depauperate as their landscape becomes more fragmented, but tropical bee species appear unaffected. These differences may be an artifact of historical differences in land‐use, or it suggests that different management plans are needed for temperate and tropical bee species. Encouragingly, genetic studies on invasive bee species indicate that low levels of genetic diversity may not lead to rapid extinction in bees as once predicted. Additionally, next‐generation sequencing has given researchers the power to identify potential genes under selection, which are likely critical to species’ survival in their rapidly changing environment. While genetic studies provide insights into wild bee biology, more studies focusing on a greater phylogenetic and life‐history breadth of species are needed. Therefore, caution should be taken when making broad conservation decisions based on the currently few species examined.