We report two unbalanced translocations involving the short arms of chromosomes 7 and 18 due to a balanced translocation 7;18 in the mother. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of the female fetus revealed an unbalanced subtelomeric translocation(karyotype 46,XX,der(18)t(7;18)(p22.3;p11.32)mat resulting in a partial trisomy 7p and a partial monosomy 18p.Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) detected a4.44-Mb heterozygous duplication at 7p22.3 to 7p22.1 and a0.178-Mb heterozygous deletion at 18p11.32. Clinical characteristics comprised a mildly stenotic bicuspid aortic valve and a small aortic arch without coarctation. The patient's older brother displayed a reciprocal version of her chromosomal aberration (46,XY,der(7)t(7;18)(p22;p11.32) resulting in a partial monosomy 7p and a partial trisomy 18p. Array CGH revealed a 4.75-Mb heterozygous deletion at 7p22.3p22.1 and a 0.579-Mb duplication at 18p11.32. He presented with tetralogy of Fallot, cleft palate, microcephalus without craniosynostosis, growth retardation, ptosis of the right eyelid, right-sided renal agenesis, unilateral cryptorchism,and mental retardation. In this report, we present the clinical phenotype in patients with aberrations of chromosomes 7p and 18p and reviewed the literature to summarize cardiovascular malformations in these patients.

Aim: To compare the performance of steroid eluting epicardial and endocardial leads in infants and children requiring permanent pacing. Methods: Evaluation of pacing and sensing characteristics, impedances, and longevity of 159 steroid eluting leads implanted in 95 children. Group A consisted of 24 children weighing less than 15 kg with 15 endocardial leads (five atrial, 10 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (five atrial, 14 ventricular). Group B consisted of 71 children weighing more than 15 kg with 106 endocardial leads (56 atrial, 58 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (nine atrial, 10 ventricular). Results: Group A: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (mean (SD) 0.84 (0.54) v 1.59 (0.64) V, p < 0.014) and at two year follow up (ventricular 0.64 (0.24) v 1.65 (0.69) V, p < 0.003). Impedance and sensing thresholds did not differ significantly at implant and follow up. Group B: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (0.72 (0.48) v 1.48 (0.58) V, p < 0.001) and at follow up (0.88 (0.46) v 1.55 (0.96) V, p < 0.009). Impedance did not differ. Sensing thresholds were also better for ventricular endocardial leads at follow up (9.1 (5.2) v 14.2 (6.4) mV, p < 0.02). Complications requiring intervention occurred in both groups (n = 7 for endocardial v n = 18 for epicardial leads). Conclusions: Endocardial and epicardial steroid eluting leads have comparable performance in the paediatric population.

RF modification of the slow AV nodal pathway in children can be safely accomplished, achieving the ideal end-point of abolishing dual AV physiology, aided by use of the LocaLisa mapping system.

No abstract

No abstract