Hypothermic machine perfusion was associated with a reduced risk of delayed graft function and improved graft survival in the first year after transplantation. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN83876362.)

The development of biliary strictures (BSs) after liver transplantation (LT) continues to affect 10% to 30% of patients, causing substantial morbidity. The cause of BSs is multifactorial, including technical, immune, and, in particular, ischemic factors. The importance of adequate flushing of the peribiliary arterial tree has been stressed. We hypothesized that high-viscosity (HV) preservation solutions in the donor do not completely flush the small donor peribiliary plexus, leading to inadequate preservation of the bile ducts and posttransplant BSs. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the incidence of BSs in 2 groups of adults undergoing LT using different types of aortic preservation solution in the donor: group 1 (n ‫؍‬ 24), low-viscosity (LV) Marshall solution; and group 2 (n ‫؍‬ 27), HV University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. All donors in both groups received additional portal flushes with UW. All LTs were performed between November 1995 and August 1998 at 2 centers by the same surgeon, eliminating a technical bias. Terminal duct-toduct anastomosis was performed in all recipients except 1 patient in group 1, who underwent a bile duct-to-jejunum anastomosis. BSs were first suspected on clinical and biochemical grounds and then confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Identical medical protocols were used in all patients. One-year patient survival rates in groups 1 and 2 were 92% and 100%, respectively (P ‫؍‬ .9). One-year graft survival was identical to patient survival. The incidence of BSs in group 1 was 4.1% (1 of 24 patients), compared to 29.7% in group 2 (8 of 27 patients; P ‫؍‬ .02). The BS in group 1 occurred 4 months post-LT and was anastomotic. BSs in group 2 occurred between 1 and 12 months post-LT and were anastomotic, extrahepatic, intrahepatic, or combined intrahepatic and extrahepatic. There were no significant differences in the following factors between groups 1 and 2: donor age, local versus imported liver, split-liver or full-liver transplantation, incidence of multiple vessels in the donor liver, indications for LT, recipient age, T-tube versus no T-tube, post-LT peak aspartate aminotransferase level, and treatment for rejection. There was no hepatic artery thrombosis or primary nonfunction in either group. Interestingly, cold ischemia time (CIT) was longer in group 1, which had the least incidence of BSs (692 ؎ 190 v 535 ؎ 129 minutes in group 2; P ‫؍‬ .001). Follow-up was longer in group 1 (28.9 ؎ 8.3 v 15.6 ؎ 8 months in group 2; P ‫؍‬ .0001). Preservation costs per procurement were 1.9 times greater in the UW group than in the Marshall group. S ince the National Institutes of Health consensus conference in 1984, results of liver transplantation (LT) have improved dramatically. In elective candidates, a 1-year survival rate of 90% can now be reached. This is caused by better patient selection and preparation, improvement in organ preservation, refinement in procurement and surgical transplantation techniques, improved anesthetic and intensive care ma...

Steroids are not necessary in more than 50% of liver transplantations. Steroids were transiently needed to treat acute rejection in 23.5% liver transplantations and for toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors or azathioprine or other reason in 28%. Of the patients who received steroids, the majority (70%) was eventually taken off steroids. This prospective single-center pilot study shows that liver transplantation without steroids is feasible and yields no penalty in terms of acute and chronic rejection, immune graft loss, graft function, patient and graft survival.

Results of this study provide empirical evidence supporting the perceived benefits and challenges of working in transplantation and support Herzberg's theory that motivators leading to job satisfaction include achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement. Transplant nursing includes many of these motivators and desirable characteristics, including autonomy and working with a multidisciplinary team on a clear, patient-centered goal.

No abstract