The rate of malignancy in nodules suspicious by Afirma was 18.3% (11/60). The rate of malignancy in nodules suspicious for neoplasm (SN) on cytology interpretation was 31.2% (5/16). False positive rate of Afirma was 56% (32/57). We conclude that cytology interpretation has a higher rate of predicting malignancy, in nodules interpreted as SN, when compared with the Afirma test, by almost twofold Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:308-311. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

BACKGROUND:The Bethesda system (TBS) for the reporting of thyroid cytopathology established the category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) with a 7% target rate and a 5% to 15% implied malignancy risk. Recent literature has reported a broad range of AUS rates, subsequent malignancy rates, and discrepant results from repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus surgical follow-up. Therefore, this study examined AUS data from the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine to determine the best clinical follow-up. METHODS: Thyroid aspirates interpreted as AUS in 2012-2014 at the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine were collected. Repeat FNA and surgical follow-up data were tabulated to establish AUS, secondary AUS (diagnosed upon repeat FNA follow-up of a primary FNA AUS diagnosis), atypia of undetermined significance/malignancy (AUS:M) ratios (according to the TBS categories), and malignancy rates for AUS. RESULTS:The AUS rate was 8.5% (976/11,481), and there was follow-up data for 545 cases. The AUS:M ratio was 2.0.Repeat FNA was performed for 281 cases; 57 proceeded to surgical intervention. Repeat FNA reclassified 71.17% of the cases. The malignancy rates for AUS cases proceeding directly to surgery and for those receiving a surgical intervention after a repeat AUS diagnosis were 33.33% and 43.75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat FNA resulted in definitive diagnostic reclassification for 67.61% of primary AUS cases and reduced the number of patients triaged to surgery, with 56.58% of the cases recategorized as benign. Cases undergoing surgery after repeat AUS had a higher malignancy rate than those going straight to surgery, and this emphasizes the value of repeat FNA in selecting surgical candidates. In addition, this study highlights the utility of AUS rate monitoring as a quality measure that has contributed to the ability of the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine to adhere closely to TBS recommendations. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2016;124:37-43.

Our study does not support the use of IFS for nodules with prior FNA interpretation of Bethesda II, III, IV and VI as management was not significantly changed. IFS is of value for nodules with prior FNA diagnosis of Bethesda I for interpretation of nodule, and Bethesda V for planning surgery. A confirmatory diagnosis could not be rendered at IFS for lesions with follicular architecture, which comprised most of the cases in Bethesda III and IV.

No abstract