Several studies have shown that a large number of patients who are fulfilling the criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are sensitive to gluten. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a gluten-free diet on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS. In this double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 148 IBS patients fulfilling the Rome III criteria were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. However, only 72 out of the 148 commenced on a gluten-free diet for up to six weeks and completed the study; clinical symptoms were recorded biweekly using a standard visual analogue scale (VAS). In the second stage after six weeks, patients whose symptoms improved to an acceptable level were randomly divided into two groups; patients either received packages containing powdered gluten (35 cases) or patients received placebo (gluten free powder) (37 cases). Overall, the symptomatic improvement was statistically different in the gluten-containing group compared with placebo group in 9 (25.7%), and 31 (83.8%) patients respectively (p < 0.001). A large number of patients labelled as irritable bowel syndrome are sensitive to gluten. Using the term of IBS can therefore be misleading and may deviate and postpone the application of an effective and well-targeted treatment strategy in gluten sensitive patients.

Aim of study:The aim of this study is to assess wavefront aberration and contrast sensitivity (CS) after implantation of foldable iris claw – artiflex- and rigid iris claw – artisan- phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs).Materials and Methods:A nonrandomized prospective comparative case study was performed on 57 eyes; of which, 54 were myopia and 3 were hyperopia. Twenty-four patients had artisan pIOL implantation and 33 had artiflex pIOL implantation. Higher-order aberration (HOA) and CS were obtained 1 year after surgery.Results:Total HOA in artisan group was greater than artiflex group (P = 0.044) with a mean HOA of 0.44 ± 0.15 root mean square (RMS) for artisan and 0.35 ± 0.15 RMS for artiflex. Although, there were no significant differences in the vertical trefoil, vertical coma, horizontal trefoil, horizontal coma, secondary astigmatism, quatrefoil, and fourth order spherical aberration in two groups. CS in mesopic conditions was better in artiflex-treated eyes at three spatial frequencies of 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) (P = 0.003, P = 0.007, and P = 0.00, respectively), and no significant difference was seen between two lenses at 3 cpd.Conclusion:Although the components of HOA were not significantly different between two groups, total HOA was higher in artisan group, which may be due to the slight differences in each component, increasing the HOA as a total. CS was significantly better in artiflex group.

Background: Three-thirds of people with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) develop multiple sclerosis (MS) within five years following their first brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Subclinical applications of optical coherence tomography (OCT) include measuring the thickness of different retinal layers and monitoring the progression of visual pathway atrophy and neurodegeneration in relation to the progress of the entire brain. Objectives: Our OCT study was conducted in individuals with RIS to evaluate the thickness of the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL) and the retinal ganglion cell layer (RGCL). Methods: In this study, 22 patients with RIS and 23 healthy individuals healthy control (HC) were enrolled. The control group and the RIS subjects underwent retinal imaging with OCT. Results: Total mRNFL thickness was 110.34 ± 13.71 μm in the RIS patients and 112.10 ± 11.23 μm in the HC group. Regional analysis of the mRNFL showed that the difference in thickness was more prominent in the superior quadrant. In regards to ganglion cell layer (GCL)++ thickness, the RIS and HCs population showed statistically significant differences in the nasal (P = 0.041), inferior (P = 0.040), and superior (P = 0.045) quadrants. The nasal (P = 0.041) quadrant showed the highest reduction in thickness compared to other regions of the GCL++. Meanwhile, no significant reduction was seen in GCL+ thickness (P-value > 0.05). When the thickness of the retinal layer of the right eye was compared to that of the left eye of the RIS group, no statistically significant differences were found (P-value > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to the control group, the RIS group had a lower mean thickness of mRNFL and GCL++, indicating retinal neuroaxonal loss.