Over the last two decades, much attention has been paid to the area of goal-oriented requirements engineering (GORE), where goals are used as a useful conceptualization to elicit, model, and analyze requirements, capturing alternatives and conflicts. Goal modeling has been adapted and applied to many sub-topics within requirements engineering (RE) and beyond, such as agent orientation, aspect orientation, business intelligence, model-driven development, and security. Despite extensive efforts in this field, the RE community lacks a recent, general systematic literature review of the area. In this work, we present a systematic mapping study, covering the 246 top-cited GORE-related conference and journal papers, according to Scopus. Our literature map addresses several research questions: we classify the types of papers (e.g., proposals, formalizations, meta-studies), look at the presence of evaluation, the topics covered (e.g., security, agents, scenarios), frameworks used, venues, citations, author networks, and overall publication numbers. For most questions, we evaluate trends over time. Our findings show a proliferation of papers with new ideas and few citations, with a small number of authors and papers dominating citations; however, there is a slight rise in papers which build upon past work (implementations, integrations, and extensions). We see a rise in papers concerning adaptation/variability/evolution and a slight rise in case studies. Overall, interest in GORE has increased. We use our analysis results to make recommendations concerning future GORE research and make our data publicly available.

Today's software is highly intertwined with our lives, and it possesses an increasing ability to act and influence us. Besides the renown example of self-driving cars and their potential harmfulness, more mundane software such as social networks can introduce bias, break privacy preferences, lead to digital addiction, etc. Additionally, the software engineering (SE) process itself is highly affected by ethical issues, such as diversity and business ethics. This paper introduces ethics-aware SE, a version of SE in which the ethical values of the stakeholders (including developers and users) are captured, analyzed, and reflected in software specifications and in the SE processes. We propose an analytical framework that assists stakeholders in analyzing ethical issues in terms of subject (software artifact or SE process), relevant value (diversity, privacy, autonomy, . . . ), and threatened object (user, developer, . . . ). We also define a roadmap that illustrates the necessary steps for the SE research and practice community in order to fully realize ethics-aware SE.

Requirements classification is a traditional application of machine learning (ML) to RE that helps handle large requirements datasets. A prime example of an RE classification problem is the distinction between functional and non-functional (quality) requirements. State-of-the-art classifiers build their effectiveness on a large set of word features like text n-grams or POS n-grams, which do not fully capture the essence of a requirement. As a result, it is arduous for human analysts to interpret the classification results by exploring the classifier's inner workings. We propose the use of more general linguistic features, such as dependency types, for the construction of interpretable ML classifiers for RE. Through a feature engineering effort, in which we are assisted by modern introspection tools that reveal the hidden inner workings of ML classifiers, we derive a set of 17 linguistic features. While classifiers that use our proposed features fit the training set slightly worse than those that use high-dimensional feature sets, our approach performs generally better on validation datasets and it is more interpretable.

No abstract

No abstract