No abstract

The origins and immediate vitality of the left/right divide which emerged in French revolutionary politics from 1789 can only be understood against the background of a much older classification dynamic based on the primacy of the right hand, first described by Robert Hertz in 1909. This dynamic infused political thinking first in Versailles and since 1815 in democracies throughout the world. In the process, the classical left/right polarity acquired a new dimension: the complementary notions of ‘accepting’ and ‘questioning’ the existing social order. An essential feature of both the age-old classical polarity and the ensuing political polarity is that they are intimately bound up with local and evolving social contexts: there is no single content-based definition of left and right. As long as the majority of us are predisposed to use our right hand when acting in the world, ‘left versus right’ will remain the most important political antithesis in western-type democracies.

Using RNA from developing cotyledons and leaves of bean two products were synthesizedin vitro, with Mr 31000 and 31500 which are antigenically related to the subunit of phytoferritin (Mr 26500). The relative abundance of the two products is dependent on the type of tissue from which the RNA was derived. Evidence is presented for the assumption that both products are precursors of the phytoferritin subunit. The hypothesis is put forward that different transit sequences direct the phytoferritin subunits to different cell organelles.

No abstract