Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an adverse prognostic factor in localized prostate cancer patients. However, whether it influences outcome of those patients with distant metastases discovered at initial diagnosis is unclear. Here, we evaluated whether the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in prostate needle biopsies is an adverse prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival in such prostate cancer patients. We retrospectively enrolled 150 eligible patients. All patients received androgen-deprivation therapy and/or chemotherapy. Their age, performance status, pain, metastatic sites, clinical T stage, serum prostatespecific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, Gleason score, and the presence of Gleason pattern 5 were analyzed. Primary end point was cancer-specific survival; secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival. Fine and Gray's model and the Cox proportional hazards model were used as statistical tests. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was detected in 100 (67%) patients. At a median follow-up of 38 months, 79 patients (53%) had died of the disease and nine (6%) had died of other causes. The average time interval to cancer-related death was 28 months. On multivariate analysis, only intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (P = 0.018) and overall survival (P = 0.001), and only the presence of Gleason pattern 5 was significantly associated with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (P = 0.026). The presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was the only significant prognostic parameter for cancer-specific survival and overall survival in prostate cancer patients with distant metastasis at presentation. These results may prove useful in planning future treatments.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Japan. To identify risk loci, we perform a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies comprising 2,039 pancreatic cancer patients and 32,592 controls in the Japanese population. Here, we identify 3 (13q12.2, 13q22.1, and 16p12.3) genome-wide significant loci (P < 5.0 × 10 −8), of which 16p12.3 has not been reported in the Western population. The lead single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at 16p12.3 is rs78193826 (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.29-1.66, P = 4.28 × 10 −9), an Asian-specific, nonsynonymous glycoprotein 2 (GP2) gene variant. Associations between selected GP2 gene variants and pancreatic cancer are replicated in 10,822 additional cases and controls of East Asian origin. Functional analyses using cell lines provide supporting evidence of the effect of rs78193826 on KRAS activity. These findings suggest that GP2 gene variants are probably associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility in populations of East Asian ancestry.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are significantly associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility. We sought to replicate the associations of 61 GWAS-identified SNPs at 42 loci with pancreatic cancer in Japanese and to develop a risk model for the identification of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer development in the general Japanese population. The model was based on data including directly determined or imputed SNP genotypes for 664 pancreatic cancer case and 664 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Stepwise logistic regression uncovered five GWAS-identified SNPs at five loci that also showed significant associations in our case-control cohort. These five SNPs were included in the risk model and also applied to calculation of the polygenic risk score (PRS). The area under the curve determined with the leave-one-out cross-validation method was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.66) or 0.61 (0.58–0.64) for versions of the model that did or did not include cigarette smoking and family history of pancreatic cancer in addition to the five SNPs, respectively. Individuals in the lowest and highest quintiles for the PRS had odds ratios of 0.62 (0.42–0.91) and 1.98 (1.42–2.76), respectively, for pancreatic cancer development compared with those in the middle quintile. We have thus developed a risk model for pancreatic cancer that showed moderately good discriminatory ability with regard to differentiation of pancreatic cancer patients from control individuals. Our findings suggest the potential utility of a risk model that incorporates replicated GWAS-identified SNPs and established demographic or environmental factors for the identification of individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer development.

No abstract

No abstract