A comparison is made between conventional X-rays and computerized tomography (CT) based on eight patients with thirteen impacted upper permanent canines. The use of CT yields information which is much more detailed than that observed on conventional X-rays, such as: pathological resorption on adjacent teeth caused by aberrant canines; the localization of the injury and the position of the canine in relation to one or both incisors. The amount of radiation per exposure is still rather high for the CT (Köster and Ewen, 1986). Further research is necessary in order to reduce this exposure and to determine the appropriate and most effective use of CT in the dental field.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract