<p><em>van Dijk (2009) stated that we need to understand the whole context before understanding a discourse. First context is the internal aspects, which is based on what the speaker said or what was written in the text - from diction and sentence study, to the paragraph's continuity, in creating context of the discourse. Second, based on its social context, which perceived the social situations as part of the discourse. Understanding of the first political speech of the elected governor of DKI Jakarta 2017, Anies Baswedan, is one of the incomprehensive practice of discourse. In addition to causing an incomprehensive understanding, the speech also reaps a controversy driven by mass media toward Anies Baswedan for the misleading meaning of the word 'pribumi'. Therefore, the researcher would like to understand Anies Baswedan political speech using van Dijk critical discourse analysis. The frame and analytical units used in this speech will be based on analysis on the social, social-politics, and social-culture contexts. The analysis result shows that the polarized social situation post-election created a social identity among community, proponent of Anies-Sandi and the political opponent, Ahok-Djarot. Moreover, we can infer that Anies Baswedan is a prominent orator, has the faith to harmony in politics, has affiliation motives, and proper knowledge about the history and culture of Jakarta and its people</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em>Van Dijk (2009) menyatakan bahwa untuk memahami sebuah praktik wacana perlu dilihat konteks secara keseluruhan. Pertama, dilihat dari konteks internal berupa tuturan penutur wacana atau dari apa yang tertulis di dalam sebuah teks—termasuk studi kata, kalimat, hingga kesinambungan paragraf yang saling mendukung dalam pembentukan konteks suatu wacana. Kedua, konteks sosialnya</em><em> yang </em><em>menganggap bahwa situasi sosial adalah bagian dari pewacanaan. Pemahaman terhadap pidato politik pertama Gubernur terpilih DKI Jakarta 2017, Anies Baswedan, merupakan salah satu praktik wacana yang tidak menyeluruh. Selain menyebabkan pemahaman yang tidak komprehensif, pidato tersebut juga menuai banyak kontroversi. Hal itu disebabkan adanya penyempitan makna oleh media massa terkait kata ‘pribumi’ yang terdapat pada pidato Anies Baswedan. Oleh karenanya, peneliti terpicu untuk memahami pidato politik Anies Baswedan dengan menggunakan analisis wacana kritis van Dijk. Kerangka dan unit-unit analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis praktik wacana dalam konteks sosial, sosial-politik, dan sosial-budaya. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa situasi sosial yang masih terpolarisasi pascapemilukada, membentuk identitas sosial masyarakat, yaitu pendukung Anies-Sandi dan pendukung lawan politiknya, Ahok-Djarot. Selain itu, dapat diketahui bahwa Anies Baswedan memiliki keterampilan sebagai orator, memiliki keyakinan terhadap pentingnya harmoni dalam politik, memiliki motif afiliasi, serta memiliki pengetahuan sejarah dan budaya yang cukup mengenai masyarakat dan kota Jakarta. </em></p><p><em><br /></em></p>

places or facilities, including religious events, social and cultural events, other events specifically related to defence and security aspects [5].In general, PSBB was meant to limit people's movement completely thoroughly, which would result in people doing more activities at home. It severely affected teaching and learning activities, people's mobility to public facilities and transportation means, and work-related activities. PSBB has shifted the heart of such activities from outside the house into the house. Statistics Indonesia (Biro Pusat Statistik or BPS) noted that since the introduction of the work from home (WFH) and PSBB systems in DKI Jakarta, at-home activities increased by 34%, accompanied by a decrease in workplace activity by 73%. BPS also noted a decrease in activities in public areas, such as public transportations, recreation areas, and retail stores where people ordinarily purchase meet their daily needs [6].PSBB also evoked an adaptation process (from changes on their regular life patterns) in the community. It is strongly suspected that such an adaptation process might create new problems, which have the potential to become stressors [7]. Since the implementation of PSBB, the community tended to spend their time at home with limited physical activity. The decreasing movement intensity might affect their circadian rhythm (referred to as 'biological clock'), a natural process inside the body that sets sleep patterns and eating patterns [8]. Changes to the circadian rhythm can cause oversleeping or sleeplessness, which in turn might cause psychological disturbances such as stress, worry, or even depression. Increased stress level might also trigger insomnia [8].Increasing economic vulnerability due to the PSBB policy, such as Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja ('Termination of Employment', hereafter referred to as PHK) or salary cuts experienced by family members, can also become a stressor. In certain levels, accumulated stress and the high degree of interaction at home might trigger familial conflicts. The Indonesian Women's Coalition for Justice and Democracy, through 111 communities in Indonesia, recorded 86 cases of domestic violence [9]. With regards to such findings, it can be said that the PSBB period was a high-risk period for individuals who were unable to control their stressor.Each individual has their ways to manage stress. Such an ability is called coping. Coping can be identified as thoughts and actions used to manage demands in internal or external situations that are considered as stressors [10]. In this paper, which was targeted on Jabodetabek community stuck in the PSBB situation, should it be carried out improperly, coping

Since its first case appeared in Depok, West Java, COVID-19 had sent people into panic and anxious apprehension. This paper aims to perceive the anxiety level of people related to the deaths caused by the COVID-19 in Jabodetabek (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi). Factors such as socioeconomic vulnerability and human cognitive level (regarding COVID-19) are also perceived to play important roles in causing such anxiety. A total of 554 respondents have participated in this study. Results showed that respondents had a low level of death anxiety, remembering, and understanding cognitive levels, but had a high level of concern regarding their ability to fulfil their food needs and adequate healthcare access.