Background Sublingual tablet buprenorphine (BUP-SL) and oral liquid methadone (MET) are the daily, standard-of-care (SOC) opioid agonist treatment medications for opioid use disorder (OUD). A sizable proportion of the OUD treatment population is not exposed to sufficient treatment to attain the desired clinical benefit. Two promising therapeutic technologies address this deficit: long-acting injectable buprenorphine and personalised psychosocial interventions (PSI). This study will determine (A) the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness — monthly injectable, extended-release (BUP-XR) in a head-to-head comparison with BUP-SL and MET, and (B) the effectiveness of BUP-XR with adjunctive PSI versus BUP-SL and MET with PSI. Safety, retention, craving, substance use, quality-adjusted life years, social functioning, and subjective recovery from OUD will be also evaluated. Methods This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority RCT, with a qualitative (mixed-methods) evaluation. The study population is adults. The setting is five National Health Service community treatment centres in England and Scotland. At each centre, participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to BUP-XR or SOC. At the London study co-ordinating centre, there will also be allocation of participants to BUP-XR with PSI or SOC with PSI. With 24 weeks of study treatment, the primary outcome is days of abstinence from non-medical opioids during study weeks 2–24 combined with up to 12 urine drug screen tests for opioids. For 90% power (alpha, 5%; 15% inflation for attrition), 304 participants are needed for the BUP-XR versus SOC comparison. With the same planning parameters, 300 participants are needed for the BUP-XR and PSI versus SOC and PSI comparison. Statistical and health economic analysis plans will be published before data-lock on the Open Science Framework. Findings will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. Discussion This pragmatic randomised controlled trial is the first evaluation of injectable BUP-XR versus the SOC medications BUP-SL and MET, with personalised PSI. If there is evidence for the superiority of BUP-XR over SOC medication, study findings will have substantial implications for OUD clinical practice and treatment policy in the UK and elsewhere. Trial registration EU Clinical Trials register 2018-004460-63.

ObjectivesDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, addiction treatment services received official guidance asking them to limit face-to-face contact with patients and to prescribe opioid agonist treatment (OAT) medication flexibly. With the aim for most patients to receive take-home supplies for self-administration rather than attendance for observed daily dosing.DesignThis was a theory-driven, clinically applied qualitative study, with data for thematic analysis collected by semi-structured, audio-recorded, telephone interviews.ParticipantsTwenty-seven adults (aged ≥18 years) enrolled in sublingual (tablet) buprenorphine and oral (liquid) methadone OAT.SettingCommunity addictions centre in the London Borough of Lambeth operated by South London and Maudsley NHS Trust.ResultsThree major themes were identified: (1) dissatisfaction and perceived stigma with OAT medication dispensing arrangements before the pandemic; (2) positive adaptations in response to COVID-19 by services; (3) participants recommended that, according to preference and evidence of adherence, OAT should be personalised to offer increasing medication supplies for self-administration from as early as 7 days after commencement of maintenance prescribing.ConclusionsIn an applied qualitative study of patients enrolled in OAT during the COVID-19 pandemic, participants endorsed their opportunity to take medication themselves at home and with virtual addiction support. Most patients described a preference for self-administration with increased dispensing supplies, from as early as 7 days into maintenance treatment, if they could demonstrate adherence to their prescription.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual buprenorphine (BUP-SL) and liquid methadone (MET) and are the standard-of-care (SOC), daily maintenance medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). A sizable proportion of the OUD treatment population does not adhere to treatment and achieve desired clinical benefit. Two promising therapeutic technologies address this deficit: new medication formulations and psychosocial interventions (PSI). This study will determine: (A) the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness – monthly injectable, extended-release (BUP-XR) a novel formulation in a head-to-head comparison with BUP-SL or MET; and (B) the effectiveness of BUP-XR with PSI versus BUP-SL or MET with PSI. Safety, retention, craving, substance use, quality-adjusted life years, social functioning, and subjective recovery will be also evaluated. METHODS: This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, open-label, four-arm, parallel group, superiority RCT, with a qualitative (mixed-methods) evaluation. The study population is adults. The setting is five specialist National Health Service community treatment programmes in England and Scotland. In all sites, participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to BUP-XR and BUP-SL or MET. At the London study co-ordinating centre, there will also be allocation of participants to BUP-XR with PSI and BUP-SL or MET with PSI. With 24 weeks of study treatment, the primary outcome is days of abstinence from all non-medical opioids during study weeks 2–24 combined with up to 12 urine drug screen tests for opioids. For 90% power (alpha, 5%; 15% inflation for attrition), 304 participants are needed for the BUP-XR and BUP-SL or MET comparison. Using the same planning parameters, 300 participants are needed for the comparison of BUP-XR and BUP-SL or MET with PSI. Statistical and health economic analysis plans will be published before data-lock on the Open Science Framework. Findings will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic randomised controlled trial is the first evaluation of injectable BUP-XR versus the SOC medications BUP-SL or MET, and with an adjunctive personalised PSI. If there is evidence for the superiority of BUP-XR over SOC, this will have substantial implications for clinical practice and OUD treatment policy in the UK and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials register (number: 2018-004460-63).