Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a vital treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), especially diabetics. The long-term benefit of the internal thoracic artery graft is well established and remains the gold standard for revascularization of severe CAD. It is not always possible to achieve complete revascularization through arterial grafts, necessitating the use of saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Unfortunately, SVGs do not have the same longevity, and their failure is associated with significant adverse cardiac outcomes and mortality. This paper reviews the pathogenesis of SVG failure, highlighting the difference between early, intermediate, and late failure. It also addresses the different surgical techniques that affect the incidence of SVG failure, as well as the medical and percutaneous prevention and treatment options in contemporary practice.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is 40 years old this year. From its humble beginnings of experimental work, PCI has transitioned over years with coronary artery stenting now a standard medical procedure performed throughout the world. Areas covered: The conversion from plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to the present era of drug eluting stents (DES) has been driven by many technological advances and large bodies of clinical trial evidence. The journey to present day practice has seen many setbacks, such as acute vessel closure with POBA; rates of instant restenosis with bare metal stents (BMS) and more recently, high rates of stent thrombosis with bioabsorbable platforms. This work discusses POBA, why there was a need for BMS, the use of inhibiting drugs to create 1 generation DES, the change of components to 2 generation DES, the use of absorbable drug reservoirs and platforms, and possible future directions with Prohealing Endothelial Progenitor Cell Capture Stents. Expert commentary: This paper reviews the evolution from the original pioneering work to modern day practice, highlighting landmark trials that changed practice. Modern day contemporary practice is now very safe based on the latest drug eluting stents and supported by large datasets.
The extent of RVMI and RV dysfunction assessed early after STEMI are independent outcome predictors, which provide incremental prognostic value to clinical data, LV systolic function, and infarct burden. Measurement of RVEF may be particularly useful to stratify risk in patients with depressed LV function after STEMI.
Objectives We set to measure the inter-atrial pressure gradient during simulated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Background OSA occurs when a sleeping patient attempts to inhale against an obstructed airway. How this event affects the inter-atrial pressure gradient has not been defined. We hypothesized that simulated OSA in a conscious subject (Mueller maneuver [MM], inspiration against obstruction) would promote increased right-to-left pressure gradient, and then the substrate for right-to-left atrial shunting. Methods Selected patients underwent simultaneous measurement of airway and atrial pressures (both left and right atrium [LA, RA]) using high-fidelity micromanometry at rest, during MM, and during VM, during right heart catheterization. Results Ten patients (age 55±11 years, 2 women) were successfully studied. During the onset of MM, RA pressure transiently but consistently exceeded LA pressure in response to the steep decline in intra-thoracic pressure (maximum RA-LA pressure gradient increased from 0.1±1.4 mmHg at baseline to 7.0±4.3 mmHg during MM, p<0.001). The maximum right-to-left atrial pressure gradient during Mueller maneuver was higher than that achieved during the Valsalva maneuver release (p<0.007). Conclusions The onset of MM increased right-to-left pressure gradient across the atrial septum, likely as a result of greater blood return to the RA from extra-thoracic veins. The RA-LA pressure gradient achieved during MM was greater than that observed during VM. These findings delineate the hemodynamic substrate for right to left shunting during OSA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.