Purpose. This is a secondary analysis of previously published data to investigate the effects of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on strength of various muscle groups in critically ill patients. Methods. One hundred forty-two consecutive patients, with APACHE II score ≥ 13, were randomly assigned to the EMS or the control group. EMS sessions were applied daily on vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and peroneus longus of both lower extremities. Various muscle groups were evaluated with the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength. Handgrip strength assessment was also employed. Results. Twenty four patients in the EMS group and 28 patients in the control group were finally evaluated. EMS patients achieved higher MRC scores than controls (P ≤ 0.05) in wrist flexion, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Collectively, the EMS group performed higher (P < 0.01) in the legs and overall. Handgrip strength correlated (P ≤ 0.01) with the upper and lower extremities' muscle strength and the overall MRC scores. Conclusions. EMS has beneficial effects on the strength of critically ill patients mainly affecting muscle groups stimulated, while it may also affect muscle groups not involved presenting itself as a potential effective means of muscle strength preservation and early mobilization in this patient population.

Background Vascular endothelial dysfunction is an underlying pathophysiological feature of chronic heart failure (CHF). Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are also impaired. The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program on the increase of EPCs at rest and on the acute response after maximal exercise in patients with CHF and investigate whether there were differences between two exercise training protocols and patients of NYHA II and III classes. Methods Forty-four patients with stable CHF enrolled in a 36-session CR program and were randomized in one training protocol; either high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or HIIT combined with muscle strength (COM). All patients underwent maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) before and after the CR program and venous blood was drawn before and after each CPET. Five endothelial cellular populations, expressed as cells/10 6 enucleated cells, were quantified by flow cytometry. Results An increase in all endothelial cellular populations at rest was observed after the CR program (p < 0.01). The acute response after maximum exercise increased in 4 out of 5 endothelial cellular populations after rehabilitation. Although there was increase in EPCs at rest and the acute response after rehabilitation in each exercise training group and each NYHA class, there were no differences between HIIT and COM groups or NYHA II and NYHA III classes (p > 0.05). Conclusions A 36-session CR program increases the acute response after maximum CPET and stimulates the long-term mobilization of EPCs at rest in patients with CHF. These benefits seem to be similar between HIIT and COM exercise training protocols and between patients of different functional classes.

No abstract