background. Independent risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after cesarean section have not been well documented, despite the large number of cesarean sections performed and the relatively common occurrence of SSI.
BACKGROUND
Accurate data on costs attributable to hospital-acquired infections are needed in order to determine their economic impact and the cost-benefit of potential preventive strategies.
OBJECTIVE
Determine the attributable costs of surgical site infection (SSI) and endometritis (EMM) after cesarean section using two different methods.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort.
SETTING
Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1250-bed academic tertiary care hospital.
PATIENTS
1,605 women who underwent low transverse cesarean section from 7/1999 – 6/2001.
METHODS
Attributable costs of SSI and EMM were determined by generalized least squares (GLS) and propensity score matched-pairs using administrative claims data to define underlying comorbidities and procedures. For the matched-pairs analyses, uninfected control patients were matched to patients with SSI or with EMM based on their propensity to develop infection, and the median difference in costs calculated.
RESULTS
The attributable total hospital cost of SSI calculated by GLS was $3,529 and by propensity score matched-pairs was $2,852. The attributable total hospital cost of EMM calculated by GLS was $3,956 and by propensity score matched-pairs was $3,842. The majority of excess costs were associated with room and board and pharmacy costs.
CONCLUSIONS
The costs of SSI and EMM were lower than SSI costs reported after more extensive operations. The attributable costs of EMM calculated using the two methods were very similar, while the costs of SSI calculated using propensity score matched-pairs were lower than the costs calculated by GLS. The difference in costs determined by the two methods needs to be considered by investigators performing cost analyses of hospital-acquired infections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.