The global tourism waved lead to a new trend of village tourism where tourists came in small groups to interacted and learned the life of villagers intensively. If the management was not well planned, this model infl icted ABSTRAKArus pariwisata global mengarah pada tren baru pariwisata pedesaan dimana wisatawan datang dalam kelompok-kelompok kecil dan berinteraksi intensif, mempelajari kehidupan masyarakat dan ikut serta dalam kegiatan penduduk desa. Pariwisata model ini rentan menyebabkan perubahan sosial budaya di masyarakat jika pengelolaannya tidak direncanakan secara matang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan merumuskan partisipasi pemuda dalam pengembangan pariwisata berbasis masyarakat (CBT) dan kontribusinya terhadap Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, Vol. 22, No 2, Agustus 2016: 137-157 ketahanan sosial budaya wilayah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan prosedur metode campuran konkuren yang mengkombinasikan pendekatan kualitatif dengan kuantitatif. Penentuan sampel dipilih berdasarkan purposive sampling dengan penggunaan kriteria berdasarkan pertimbangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pemuda merupakan bagian dari aktor pengelola CBT di Desa Wisata Pentingsari (Dewi Peri). Partisipasi pemuda berada pada tingkat partisipasi citizen power dengan bobot rata-rata sebesar 70 persen. Model pengembangan CBT di Dewi Peri memungkinkan seluruh masyarakat terlibat secara aktif sebagai aktor utama. Partisipasi pemuda dalam pengembangan CBT di Dewi Peri berkontribusi terhadap ketahanan sosial budaya wilayah berdasarkan parameter asas kemitraan, kesejahteraan, perlindungan, kemandirian, kerukunan, nilai sosial dan budaya lokal. Ketahanan sosial budaya wilayah terbentuk melalui pelestarian sosial budaya secara dinamis dengan melindungi, mengembangkan dan memanfaatkan sosial-budaya lokal melalui aktivitas pariwisata. JURNAL KETAHANAN NASIONAL

The reality of Indonesian multiculturalism is the fortune and wealth as far as its diversity is recognized, internalized, and responded with tolerance. If plurality becomes the separator that forms the symbol of a group and personal ego, then plurality becomes the cause of dispute, intolerance, and even radicalism. The cases of violence in the name of religion target all levels of society, including young intellectuals. This study aims to observe the scholar's perspective on radicalism in the name of religion in multicultural reality. The samples were 649 fourth semesters scholars in ITB, UNPAD, UPI, UIN Sunan Gunung Jati, UNPAS, UNISBA, and POLBAN in 2012. According to the research, most of the students have a good multicultural understanding. 65% of respondents have an awareness of accepting and appreciating differences, and 63% accept and appreciate differences in religious activities. Only 2% (almost always) and 32% (sometimes) commit acts of discrimination. However, half of the respondents (42% slightly agree and 8% agree) have an intolerant view. 21% of respondents slightly agree, and 3% agreed to view jihad as synonymous with violence. Surprisingly, 22% of respondents slightly agree, and 3% agreed to interpret jihad as terrorism. Moreover, 15% of respondents slightly agree, and 2% agreed to view suicide bombing as an act of jihad. Young intellectuals should have a clear understanding of jihad both etymologically or epistemologically. Overcoming the phenomenon of radicalism must depart from the core of the problems. One method is de-radicalization to straighten out a narrow-minded in a friendly, tolerant, peaceful, and humane way in the social, political, economic, and educational fields.