No abstract

Background Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.Methods ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.

No abstract

Adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived protein, is an essential modulator of insulin sensitivity and several studies suggest an important role of adiponectin in the processes leading to atherosclerosis, thus indicating the adiponectin gene as a potential candidate for coronary artery disease (CAD). In the present study we have studied the association between two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (+45T>G and +276 G>T) of the adiponectin gene and CAD, looking also into the possible influence of these SNPs on adiponectin plasma levels. The SNPs were analysed in a first cohort of 595 subjects, 325 with CAD and 270 matched controls. We observed a significant association (p<0.001) between the SNP +276G>T in the adiponectin gene and CAD. In multivariate analysis, carriers of the +276G>T SNP had an odds ratio (OR) for CAD of 4.99 (p<0.0007). A strong interaction between the +276G>T SNP and age was also present (OR, 1.03; p<0.0001). The increase in CAD risk was most evident among individuals with early-onset CAD (age T SNP was analysed in a second cohort of CAD and controls. The difference between CAD and controls in the +276G>T SNP frequencies showed a similar trend as before, although not significant. The combination of the two cohorts (1,046 subjects: 580 CAD and 466 controls) showed a statistically significant association, particularly in CAD subjects with early-onset of disease. In addition, we confirmed that in younger CAD subjects the SNP was a significant determinant of lower levels of adiponectin. In view of these results, it could be speculated that the adiponectin gene variant, or a mutation in linkage with it, determines lower adiponectin gene expression, causing in turn an increased risk to develop insulin resistance, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. The significant association of the adiponectin gene in subjects with early-onset CAD also suggests that that genetic factors for late-onset diseases may exert a greater influence in younger persons, when other risk factors are not as prevalent as in older age groups.

The data suggest that adjunctive use of DEB for the treatment of SFA-ISR represents a potentially safe and effective therapeutic strategy. These data should be considered hypothesis-generating to design a randomized trial.