No abstract

An interesting issue little explored in the celebrity endorsement literature is whether or not the activities of a celebrity endorser affect company performance. We examine the impact of Tiger Woods' tournament performance on the endorsing firm's value subsequent to the contract signing. We do not find a relationship between Tiger's tournament placement and the excess returns of Fortune Brands (parent of Titleist). This is likely due to Titleist being a very small contributor to the total market value of Fortune Brands. We also fail to find a significant relationship for American Express suggesting the market does not view a golfer endorsing financial services as credible. We do, however, find a positive and significant impact of Tiger's performance on Nike's excess returns suggesting that the market values the additional publicity that Nike receives when Tiger is in contention to win.