No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives: To analyze outcomes following endovascular treatment of total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and aorto–iliac bifurcation in a multicenter Italian registry. Methods: It is a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. From January 2015 to December 2018, 1306 endovascular interventions for aorto–iliac occlusive disease were recorded in the vascular registry. For this analysis, only patients treated for total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and aorto–iliac bifurcation were included. Early (<30 days) primary outcomes of interest were technical success and mortality. Late major outcomes were primary and secondary patency and freedom from conversion to open aortic surgery. Results: A total of 54 (4.1%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Total percutaneous revascularization was possible in 41 (75.9%) patients and hybrid (endo plus open) intervention in 13 (24.1%) patients. The kissing-stent-graft technique was used in 45 (83.3%) cases, covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) in 5 (9.2%), and a unibody endograft deployed in 4 (7.4%). Technical success was 98.1% (n = 53). There were no episodes of intraoperative or perioperative vessel rupture. Conversion to open surgery was not necessary, and there were no in-hospital deaths. The median patient follow-up time was 16 months (interquartrile range [IQR], 6-27). The estimated primary patency rate was 95.8% ± 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.5-98.9) at 1 year, 91.4% ± 0.05 (95% CI: 76.2-97.2) at 2 years, and 85 ± 0.08 (95% CI: 64.5-94.6) at 3 years. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.15-6.23, p = 0.963), extent of the occlusion (HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.05-1.46, p = 0.130), calcium score (HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 0.31-11.27, p = 0.490), or type of endovascular reconstruction (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.13-5.15, p = 0.804) did not affect primary patency. Secondary patency was 95.5% ± 0.04 (95% CI: 78.4-99.2) at 3 years. No patients required late conversion to open surgical bypass. Conclusions: Endovascular reconstruction for total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and aorto–iliac bifurcation was successful using a combination of percutaneous and hybrid revascularization techniques. Estimated patency rates at 3 years of follow-up are promising and are unaffected by the extent of occlusion or type of revascularization.

Objective: To assess and compare the maturation rate of the native radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) created with and without a nitinol external support (VasQ™ Laminate Medical Technologies Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel). Methods: Data of all consecutive patients who underwent the creation of native RC-AVFs at our center between October 2018 and January 2020 was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Selected patients who had a suitable vein and a radial artery with triphasic flow at preoperative duplex ultrasound exam and were selected for the creation of a radiocephalic fistula were included. Exclusion criteria were: malignant tumors, acute renal failure, previous upper limb revascularization, and septic status. Patency and maturation, vein, and artery diameter and blood flow rate were assessed at the following intervals: post-operatively, 24 h post-operatively, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively. Results: Forty-nine patients (31 males, mean age 65.7 years old) were included. Patients who received VasQ™ devices were 25 (VasQ group), the other 24 formed the control group. All patients underwent radio-cephalic AVF placement (21 on the wrist, 20 on the forearm, 8 on the proximal forearm). There were no perioperative complications and fatalities. At 1, 3, and 6 months, primary patency rates were 96 ± 4%, 96 ± 4%, 91 ± 6% (VasQ group) versus 87 ± 7%, 87 ± 7%, 80 ± 9% (control group, P 0.17), secondary patency rates were 96 ± 4%, 96 ± 4%, 91 ± 6% (VasQ group) versus 95 ± 4%, 90 ± 7%, 90 ± 7% (control group, P 0.79). A significantly larger vein diameter increase postoperatively (P 0.009) and a greater maturation rate (96% vs 74%, p 0.044) were found in the VasQ group compared to the control group. Conclusions: The use of the VasQ™ device was associated with higher maturation rates and larger vein diameters postoperatively. The patency rates were slightly higher but not significantly. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.