The aim of this work was the preparation and characterization of a silicon surface modified by different self‐assembled aminopropylsilanes with the purpose of using them in sensor applications. Single‐crystal silicon wafers (111) were modified with aminosilanes that have different numbers of bonding sites: 3‐aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), 3‐aminopropyldiethoxymethylsilane (APRDMS) and 3‐aminopropylethoxydimethylsilane (APREMS). We deposited the self‐assembled layers from a solution of aminosilanes in toluene under various reaction conditions. The surface composition and the chemical bonding were determined using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Furthermore, the surface morphology was investigated using atomic force microscopy. Our results show that the reactivity with the Si‐oxide layer and the polymerization of aminosilanes depend on the number of possible bonding sites. The APTMS reacted the most intensively with the Si‐oxide layer; a less intensive reaction was observed for the APRDMS; and the least intensive reaction was observed for the APREMS. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The article offers a comparison of the sensitivities for vapour trace detection of Trinitrotoluene (TNT) explosives of two different sensor systems: a chemo-mechanical sensor based on chemically modified Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) cantilevers based on Micro Electro Mechanical System (MEMS) technology with optical detection (CMO), and a miniature system based on capacitive detection of chemically functionalized planar capacitors with interdigitated electrodes with a comb-like structure with electronic detection (CE). In both cases (either CMO or CE), the sensor surfaces are chemically functionalized with a layer of APhS (trimethoxyphenylsilane) molecules, which give the strongest sensor response for TNT. The construction and calibration of a vapour generator is also presented. The measurements of the sensor response to TNT are performed under equal conditions for both systems, and the results show that CE system with ultrasensitive electronics is far superior to optical detection using MEMS. Using CMO system, we can detect 300 molecules of TNT in 10+12 molecules of N2 carrier gas, whereas the CE system can detect three molecules of TNT in 10+12 molecules of carrier N2.