No abstract

Transient elastography (FibroScan [FS]) is a novel non-invasive tool to assess liver fibrosis/ cirrhosis. However, it remains to be determined if other liver diseases such as extrahepatic cholestasis interfere with fibrosis assessment because liver stiffness is indirectly measured by the propagation velocity of an ultrasound wave within the liver. In this study, we measured liver stiffness immediately before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 3 to 12 days after successful biliary drainage in patients with extrahepatic cholestasis mostly due to neoplastic invasion of the biliary tree. Initially elevated liver stiffness decreased in 13 of 15 patients after intervention, in 10 of them markedly. In three patients, liver stiffness was elevated to a degree that suggested advanced liver cirrhosis (mean, 15.2 kPa). Successful drainage led to a drop of bilirubin by 2.8 to 9.8 mg/dL whereas liver stiffness almost normalized (mean, 7.1 kPa). In all patients with successful biliary drainage, the decrease of liver stiffness highly correlated with decreasing bilirubin (Spearman's ‫؍‬ 0.67, P < 0.05) with a mean decrease of liver stiffness of 1.2 ؎ 0.56 kPa per 1 g/dL bilirubin. Two patients, in whom liver stiffness did not decrease despite successful biliary drainage, had advanced liver cirrhosis and multiple liver metastases, respectively. The relationship between extrahepatic cholestasis and liver stiffness was reproduced in an animal model of bile duct ligation in landrace pigs where liver stiffness increased from 4.6 kPa to 8.8 kPa during 120 minutes of bile duct ligation and decreased to 6.1 kPa within 30 minutes after decompression. Conclusion: Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness irrespective of fibrosis. Once extrahepatic cholestasis is excluded (e.g., by liver imaging and laboratory parameters) transient elastography is a valuable tool to assess liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases.

Patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be cured by liver transplantation (LT). However, many patients drop out during the waiting time as a result of tumor progression. We prospectively investigated the effect of transarterial chemoembolization on long-term survival of 116 patients with HCC listed for LT. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that patients with either complete or partial response to therapy (no vital tumor or devascularization of Ն30%, respectively) as assessed by computed tomographic scan before LT had far better 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates (100, 93.2, and 85.7%; and 93.8, 83.6, and 66.2%, respectively) compared with those with no response or with tumor progression (82.4, 50.7, and 19.3%). Posttransplant survival analysis showed a marked survival benefit according to transarterial chemoembolization response: patients with complete or partial response had 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of 89.1, 85.1, and 85.1%, and 88.6, 77.4, and 63.9%, respectively, compared with 68.6, 51.4, and 51.4% for patients whose disease did not respond to therapy. Subgroup analysis, however, showed that these benefits were only seen in patients whose disease met the Milan criteria, but not in disease exceeding the Milan criteria but fitting the expanded University of California at San Francisco criteria. These patients were also more likely to drop out as a result of tumor progression while waiting for LT (dropout rate 12.1 vs. 2.9%) and to develop recurrent HCC (21.6 vs. 7.6%). Downstaged patients did even worse, with a dropout rate of 26.7% and a 5-year survival rate of only 25%. In conclusion, the response to preoperative chemoembolization may predict long-term outcome after LT. Liver Transpl 13:272-279, 2007. © 2007 AASLD.Received May 18, 2006; accepted October 4, 2006. The last 3 decades have seen an increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in western countries. 1 HCC is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, with an estimated annual incidence of about 1 million cases. [2][3][4] The main risk factor for the development of HCC is cirrhosis, regardless of cause. 5 Standard therapy for HCC depends on the size of tumor and the stage of underlying liver disease. Patients with advanced tumor disease have no chance of curative treatment, whereas those with small HCC have the option of orthotopic liver transplantation (LT). LT has been considered the only curative treatment because it has been claimed to cure the malignant disease by replacing the premalignant cirrhotic liver. Survival and recurrence rates after LT for HCC have markedly improved over the years, in particular by appropriate selection criteria. 6-11 Despite stringent criteria for patient selection, liver transplant waiting lists are getting longer, and both Europe and the United States are facing a continually worsening discrepancy between

No abstract