A positive response to CRT was observed in 68% of the patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response is predictable using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data.

The present study did not show any difference between RVA and RVHS pacing sites in terms of overall improvement in clinical outcome and LV reverse remodelling following CRT. However, effect of RV lead location on CRT response varies depending on LV stimulation site.

Objective:Fragmented QRS (fQRS) complexes that have numerous RSR´ patterns represent alteration of ventricular depolarization. We evaluated the relationship between fQRS and poor coronary collateral circulation and the diagnostic ability of fQRS for myocardial scar detection in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) without a history of myocardial infarction.Methods:The study population consisted of patients undergoing coronary angiography with a suspicion of CAD. Seventy-nine patients with one totally occluded major coronary artery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were history of MI; recent acute coronary syndrome; pathologic Q wave on 12-lead ECG; cardiomyopathy or severe valvular disease; coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Collateral circulation was scored on the basis of Rentrop's classification. All patients were assessed by myocardial perfusion SPECT. Fragmented QRS was characterized as existence of an R´ or R wave or S wave notch in two adjacent leads related to the location of a major coronary artery region. Single and multiple logistic regression analyses were completed in the forward method.Results:Forty-nine patients had poor and 30 had well-developed collateral circulation. Fragmented QRS complexes were significantly higher in the poor collateral group (81% vs. 20%, p<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values of fQRS for myocardial scar identification were 89.4%, 87.5%, and 91.3% and 84.8%, respectively. The summed stress score and the summed rest score on SPECT were significantly higher in the poor collateral group than in the well-developed group (p<0.001) as well as in the fQRS group than the non-fQRS group (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of fQRS was significantly and independently associated with poor collateral circulation and myocardial scar in patients with CTO.Conclusion:Fragmented QRS is independently related to poor coronary collateral circulation in patients with CTO without prior myocardial infarction. Notably, it can be a good predictor of myocardial scar rather than merely ischemia, with high diagnostic accuracy.

Objective:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is introduced as a promising therapeutic option in heart failure (HF) patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. The challenge, however, is identifying the patients who are suitable candidates for this procedure. Fragmented QRS (fQRS) is associated with subendocardial fibrosis and myocardial scars. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of fragmented QRS complex on a routine 12-lead ECG as a predictor of response to CRT.Methods:Sixty-five consecutive patients with HF who underwent CRT, were studied. Patients’ resting 12-lead ECGs were analyzed to find presence of fQRS by a cardiologist. Echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as ≥15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) after CRT implantation. Response to CRT was compared between patients with and without fQRS.Results:The study group included 27 women (41.5%) and 38 men (58.5%) with a mean (±SD) age of 62±12 years. 27 patients (41.5%) had fQRS in their basal ECGs. Totally 46 patients (70.8%) responded to CRT in a way that the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (%) significantly increased, and left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) significantly decreased after CRT (p<0.001 and p=0.001 respectively). In multivariate logistic analysis, lack of fQRS was found to be a predictor of response to CRT (OR: 4.553, 95% CI: 1.345-15.418, p=0.015).Conclusion:We showed that the fQRS complex, as a sign of myocardial scar, predicts non-responsiveness to CRT. Therefore, fQRS may help selecting of CRT candidates.

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a regular, macro reentrant arrhythmia traditionally defined as a supraventricular tachycardia with an atrial rate of 240-320 beats per minute (bpm). Pathophysiology of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation (AF) is closely related to the similar risk of stroke and they coexist clinically. Atrial flutter is classified to cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent (or typical) and non-isthmus dependent (atypical). Isthmus is a distinct structure in the right atrium (RA) through which atrial flutter passes and makes a good target for ablation therapy. Ablation is the primary therapy in atrial flutter, particularly in CTI dependent group, with regard to its safety profile and high success rate of approximately 90%. Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping is progressively being used to ablate atypical forms of atrial flutter.