AIMS Intracerebral hemorrhage is one of the most devastating subtypes of stroke, leaving survivors with severe neurological deficits. Disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB) following hemorrhage results in development of vasogenic brain edema, a most life-threatening event after such events as intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The Evans Blue assay is a popular method for the quantification of BBB disruption. Although this method is in common use, there are several protocols of the assay in the literature which vary in the route of administration, as well as the circulation time of the stain. In this study, we compared the amounts of accumulated stain in brain tissue following intraperitoneal versus intravenous injection at 0.5, 3 and 24 hours of circulation time. METHODS 58 CD-1 mice were used. Animals were divided into ICH (N=42), sham groups (N= 6) and naïve (N=10). ICH animals received stereotactic injection of collagenase type VII into the right basal ganglia. Sham animals received only needle trauma. Evans Blue stain was injected 24 hours after collagenase injection or needle trauma. The consistency of ICH produced was characterized by estimation of hematoma volume via hemoglobin assay and neurological evaluation. RESULTS The produced hematoma and neurological deficits were well comparable between different experimental groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the results of the Evans Blue assay with regard to administration route. CONCLUSIONS The amount of Evans Blue stain accumulated in the brains of mice after ICH produced by collagenase injection was independent of the stain administration route.
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating type of stroke. It is characterized by spontaneous bleeding in brain parenchyma and is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Presently, there is neither an effective therapy to increase survival after intracerebral hemorrhage nor a treatment to improve the quality of life for survivors. A reproducible animal model of spontaneous ICH mimicking the development of acute and delayed brain injury after ICH is an invaluable tool for improving our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of ICH-induced brain injury and evaluating potential therapeutic interventions. A number of models have been developed. While different species have been studied, rodents have become the most popular and widely utilized animals used in ICH research. The most often used methods for experimental induction of ICH are injection of bacterial collagenase and direct injection of blood into the brain parenchyma. The “balloon” method has also been used to mimic ICH for study. In this summary, we intend to provide a comparative overview of the technical methods, aspects, and pathologic findings of these types of ICH models. We will also focus on the similarities and differences among these rodent models, achievements in technical aspects of the ICH model, and discuss important aspects in selecting relevant models for study.
Neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) is a devastating condition resulting in neuronal cell death and often culminates in neurological deficits. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to have neuroprotective activity via inhibition of apoptosis and inflammation in various stroke models. Stem cell factor (SCF) regulates hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and has been reported to have neuroprotective properties in an experimental ischemic stroke model. In this study we aim to determine the protective effects of G-CSF in combination with SCF treatment after experimental HI. Methods Seven-day old Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to unilateral carotid artery ligation followed by 2.5 hours of hypoxia. Animals were randomly assigned to five groups: Sham (n=8), Vehicle (n=8), HI with G-CSF treatment (n=9), HI with SCF treatment (n=9) and HI with G-CSF+SCF treatment (coadministration group; n=10). G-CSF (50 µg/kg), SCF (50 µg/kg) and G-CSF+SCF (50 µg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally 1 hour post HI followed by daily injection for 4 consecutive days (five total injections). Animals were euthanized 14 days after HI for neurological testing. Additionally assessment of brain, heart, liver, spleen and kidney atrophy was performed. Results Both G-CSF and G-CSF+SCF treatments improved body growth and decreased brain atrophy at 14days post HI. No significant differences were found in the peripheral organ weights between groups. Finally, the G-CSF+SCF coadministration group showed significant improvement in neurological function. Conclusion Our data suggest that administration of G-CSF in combination with SCF not only prevented brain atrophy but also significantly improved neurological function.
This study investigated the effect of geldanamycin post-treatment on the development of secondary brain injury and neurological deficits in a mouse model of intracerebral hemorrhage. CD-1 mice received stereotactic injection of collagenase type VII into the right basal ganglia. Treatment groups were administered 1mg/kg (low dose) or 10mg/kg (high dose) of geldanamycin. Mice were euthanized at two time-points: 24 hrs or 72 hrs. Blood-brain-barrier permeability, brain edema, and neurobehavioral deficits were assessed. Additionally, the effects of geldanamycin on heat shock protein 27 and 72; tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 1 beta expressions were evaluated.High dose geldanamycin significantly attenuated blood brain barrier disruption and brain edema after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurobehavioral outcomes were significantly improved in some parameters by high dose treatment. Molecular results showed a marked increase in heat shock protein 72 expression in ipsilateral brain of geldanamycin treated groups with a reduction in the proinflammatory tumor necrosis factor-alpha.CONCLUSION-Geldanamycin post-treatment is neuroprotective in the mouse model of intracerebral hemorrhage. Geldanamycin administration results in reduction of inflammation, preservation of blood-brain-barrier and amelioration of neurobehavioral deficits after an insult possibly by upregulation of heat shock protein 72.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.