executed the experiments. Tanya Verma, Purbasha Dasgupta and Bodhisatta Nandy analysed and interpreted the results.

Detrimental effect of males on female, often termed mate-harm, is a hallmark of sexual conflict. Allowed to evolve unchecked, mate harming traits are predicted to bring down average fitness of a population, unless mitigated by the evolution of resistance in females. In addition, life history may also modulate sexual conflict, but the mechanism is not clearly understood. Here we investigated the evolution of mate-harm in a set of experimentally evolved laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster wherein a faster aging has evolved in response to >1000 generations of selection for faster development and early reproduction. We quantified mortality and fecundity of Oregon R females held with evolved (ACO) and ancestral males (CO) to show that the evolved males are significantly less detrimental to their mates. We compared our results from the ACO males with that from a phenocopied version of the ancestral regime (CCO) to show that only part of the observed difference in mate-harm can be attributed to the evolved difference in body size. We further show that the reduction in mate harming ability evolved despite an increase in courtship activity, especially early in life. We discuss the causative role of an evolved reproductive schedule and altered breeding ecology.