The gut microbiome is shaped by diet and influences host metabolism, but these links are complex and can be unique to each individual. We performed deep metagenomic sequencing of >1,100 gut microbiomes from individuals with detailed long-term diet information, as well as hundreds of fasting and same-meal postprandial cardiometabolic blood marker measurements. We found strong associations between microbes and specific nutrients, foods, food groups, and general dietary indices, driven especially by the presence and diversity of healthy and plant-based foods. Microbial biomarkers of obesity were reproducible across cohorts, and blood markers of cardiovascular disease and impaired glucose tolerance were more strongly associated with microbiome structure. While some microbes such as Prevotella copri and Blastocystis spp., were indicators of reduced postprandial glucose metabolism, several species were more directly predictive for postprandial triglycerides and C-peptide. The panel of intestinal species associated with healthy dietary habits overlapped with those associated with favourable cardiometabolic and postprandial markers, indicating our large-scale resource can potentially stratify the gut microbiome into generalizable health levels among individuals without clinically manifest disease. Fig. 1: The PREDICT 1 study associates gut microbiome structure with habitual diet and blood cardiometabolic markers. (A)The PREDICT 1 study assessed the gut microbiome of 1,098 volunteers from the UK and US via metagenomic sequencing of stool samples. Phenotypic data obtained through in-person assessment, blood/biospecimen collection, and the return of validated study questionnaires queried a range of relevant host/environmental factors including (1) personal characteristics, such as age, BMI, and estimated visceral fat; (2) habitual dietary intake using semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs);(3) fasting; and (4) postprandial cardiometabolic blood and inflammatory markers, total lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, lipoprotein particle sizes, apolipoproteins, derived metabolic risk scores, glycaemic-mediated metabolites, and metabolites related to fatty acid metabolism. (B) Overall microbiome alpha diversity, estimated as the total number of confidently identified microbial species in a given sample (richness), was correlated with HDL-D (positive) and estimated hepatic steatosis (negative). Up to ten strongest absolute Spearman correlations are reported for each category with q<0.05. Top species based on Shannon diversity are reported in Supplementary Fig. 1A and all correlations are in Supplementary Table 1. Microbial diversity and composition are linked with diet and fasting and postprandial biomarkersWe first leveraged a unique subpopulation of our study comprised of 480 twins to disentangle the confounding effects of shared genetics from other factors on microbiome composition. Our data confirmed that host genetics influences microbiome composition only to a small extent 18 , as intra-twin pair microbiome ...

(Figure 2c), and less than 1% of variation for postprandial triglyceride and postprandial C-peptide (Figure 2b and 2d). Gut microbiome (16S rRNA). We estimated the contribution of gut microbiome composition using relative bacterial taxonomic abundances and measures of community diversity and richness, derived from 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing of baseline stool specimens (Supplemental Table 4). We found that without adjusting for any other individual characteristics the gut microbiome composition explained 7.5% of postprandial triglyceride6h-rise, 6.4% of postprandial glucoseiAUC0-2h and 5.8% of postprandial C-peptide1h-rise. Meal composition, habitual diet and meal context. To determine the impact of the macronutrient composition of meals, we measured triglyceride6h-rise and C-peptide1h-rise for two standardized home phase meals of contrasting macronutrient compositions (for triglyceride, comparison of meals 1 and 7: 85 vs 28g of carbohydrate and 50 vs 40 g of fat at breakfast, both followed by a lunch of 71g carbohydrate and 22g fat; for C-peptide, comparison of meal 2 and 3: 71 vs 41 g of carbohydrate and 22 vs 35 g of fat; Supplement Table 2) in subsets of participants (n=712 and n=186, respectively). GlucoseiAUC0-2h was measured for seven standardized meals (comparison of meals 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8: 28 -95 g carbohydrate; 0 -53 g fat) totalling 9,102 meals in 920 individuals. The proportions of variance explained by meal composition, habitual diet, and by meal context are shown for triglyceride6h-risein Figure 2b, for glucoseiAUC0-2hin Figure 2c, and for C-peptide1h-risein Figure 2d. A multivariate regression model (meals 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) revealed that the Glucosei AUC0-2h (mmol/L*s) was significantly (P<0.001) reduced by 79, 142 and 185 for every 1g fat, fiber and protein respectively, after adjustment for carbohydrate consumption. Machine learning model. To estimate the unbiased predictive utility of the factors analysed, we used a machine learning approach robust to overfitting 22 . Random Forest regression models 23 were fitted using all the informative features (meal composition, habitual diet, meal context, anthropometry, genetics, microbiome, clinical and biochemical parameters) to predict triglyceride6h10 described in the Methods, we considered not only the effect of the meal macronutrient and energy content in the response (meal composition), but also considered how each individual responded on average to all their set meals relative to the population (individual glucose scaling), as well as the effect of the individual's meal-specific response, the error attributable to the glucose measurement and other sources of variation (including modifiable sources of variation such as sleep, circadian rhythm and exercise). We found that, consistent with the linear models described earlier, the ANOVA models show that there are three meal-related factors explaining individual glycemic responses. Meal macronutrient composition alters iAUC by 16.73% (95%CI 15.37 -18.92%), but the individual glucose...

Background and aimsGut transit time is a key modulator of host–microbiome interactions, yet this is often overlooked, partly because reliable methods are typically expensive or burdensome. The aim of this single-arm, single-blinded intervention study is to assess (1) the relationship between gut transit time and the human gut microbiome, and (2) the utility of the ‘blue dye’ method as an inexpensive and scalable technique to measure transit time.MethodsWe assessed interactions between the taxonomic and functional potential profiles of the gut microbiome (profiled via shotgun metagenomic sequencing), gut transit time (measured via the blue dye method), cardiometabolic health and diet in 863 healthy individuals from the PREDICT 1 study.ResultsWe found that gut microbiome taxonomic composition can accurately discriminate between gut transit time classes (0.82 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and longer gut transit time is linked with specific microbial species such as Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides spp and Alistipes spp (false discovery rate-adjusted p values <0.01). The blue dye measure of gut transit time had the strongest association with the gut microbiome over typical transit time proxies such as stool consistency and frequency.ConclusionsGut transit time, measured via the blue dye method, is a more informative marker of gut microbiome function than traditional measures of stool consistency and frequency. The blue dye method can be applied in large-scale epidemiological studies to advance diet-microbiome-health research. Clinical trial registry website https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03479866 and trial number NCT03479866.