PurposeHost response to polytrauma occasionally has unpredictable outcomes. Immune response is a major factor influencing patient's outcome. This study evaluated the interaction of two main cytokines in immune response after major trauma, specifically interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-10 (IL-10). Plasma level of these cytokines is determined by mRNA expression of these cytokines genes which may decide the outcome of polytrauma patients.MethodsThis prospective multicenter trial held at four trauma centers enrolled 54 polytrauma patients [Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16]. Plasma levels and mRNA expression of IL-6 and IL-10 were measured for 5 days after trauma. Clinical evaluation was conducted to observe whether patients endured multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death. MODS evaluation was performed using sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). Trauma load which in this study is represented with ISS, plasma level, expression of cytokine genes and patient's outcome were examined with correlation test and statistical analysis.ResultsThe elevated IL-6/IL-10 ratio indicated increased activity of systemic inflammation response, especially pro-inflammation response which bears higher probability of progressing to MODS and death. The decline of IL-6/IL-10 ratio with heavy trauma load (ISS > 30) showed that compensatory anti-inflammation response syndrome (CARS) state was more dominant than systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), indicating that malfunction and failure of immune system eventually lead to MODS and deaths. The statistical significance in plasma level of cytokines was found in the outcome group which was defined as bearing a low trauma load but mortality.ConclusionThe pattern of cytokine levels in inflammation response has great impact on the outcome of polytrauma patients. Further study at the genetic level is needed to investigate inflammation process which may influence patient's outcome.

Trauma is the main cause of deaths among teenagers and young adults. Most of the cases are due to traffic accidents, therefore, a scoring system that can transforms the trauma quality to numbers is very valuable. This scoring system is needed to predict mortality, compare therapeutic methods, function as a triage tool pre hospitalization and during the way to the hospital, evaluate quality improvement and prevention program, and as a tool in trauma studies. There are several available scoring systems usually used in trauma studies, as follows: Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS). This study aimed to obtain the easiest applicable scoring system to multitraumatic patients in Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado. This was an observational correlation study. Evaluation of mortality was done by using the scoring systems and then was compared to the results in the field. There were 37 multitraumatic patients consisted of 30 males and 7 females. Five patients died during this study. By using RTS, of score >7 there was 1 death; of score 6-7 there were 3 deaths; and of score-5 there was 1 death. By using ISS, all dead patients had score ≥25, meanwhile by using TRISS, 2 dead patients had score 81-100,1 dead patient had score 61-80, and 2 dead patients had score 41-60. Conclusion: RTS is the easiest applicable scoring system at triage and pre-hospitalization, and is recommended to be a part of management of multitraumatic patients. Along with ISS, RTS can be used as a mortality predictor among multitraumatic patients.Keywords: trauma, RTS, ISS, TRISS, mortalityAbstrak: Trauma merupakan penyebab kematian utama pada usia remaja dan dewasa muda. Sistim penilaian (skoring) yang dapat mengubah kualitas trauma ke dalam bentuk nilai diperlukan agar dapat meramalkan mortalitas, membandingkan metode terapi, merupakan alat triase pre- dan antar rumah sakit, menilai perbaikan kualitas dan program pencegahan, serta merupakan alat dalam studi trauma. Beberapa sistem skoring yang sering digunakan dalam penelitian ialah Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), dan Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan pilihan sistim skoring yang paling mudah diaplikasikan pada pasien multitrauma di BLU RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou, Manado. Jenis penelitian ialah observasional korelatif. Penilaian ini mengaplikasikan masing-masing skor terhadap angka mortalitas dan dibandingkan dengan hasil yang diperoleh di lapangan. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat 37 pasien multitrauma, terdiri dari 30 laki-laki dan 7 perempuan. Jumlah pasien yang meninggal selama penelitian ialah 5 orang. Untuk RTS, dari pasien dengan skor >7 terdapat 1 kematian; dari pasien dengan skor 6-7 terdapat 3 kematian, dan dari pasien dengan skor 5 terdapat 1 kematian. Untuk ISS, semua pasien yang meninggal memiliki skor ≥25, sedangkan untuk TRISS, 2 pasien yang meninggal dengan skor 81-100, 1 pasien dengan skore 61-80, dan 2 pasien yang meninggal dengan skor 41-60. Simpulan: RTS paling mudah diaplikasikan saat triase dan fase pre rumah sakit, serta direkomendasikan untuk menjadi bagian dari pedoman penanganan kasus multitrauma. Bersama-sama dengan ISS, RTS dapat diaplikasikan sebagai prediktor mortalitas pasien multitrauma.Kata kunci: trauma, RTS, ISS, TRISS, mortalitas

Background Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in patients with major trauma remains a frequent and devastating complication in emergency departments and intensive care units. Easily and accurately identifying patients at risk for MODS post-injury, especially in multi-trauma cases, is important. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to predict the development of MODS in adult multi-trauma patients using clinical and laboratory data available in the first 24 h after trauma. Methods We prospectively enrolled adult multi-trauma patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16, between 16 and 65 years old, admitted to four academic Level-I trauma centers for 1 year between September 2014 and 2015. Sequential organ failure assessment score was used to determine MODS during hospitalization. A risk score was created from the final regression model consisting of significant variables as MODS predictors. Result During the period of the study, 98 multi-trauma patients were included. The mean age was 35.2 years, and most were male (85.71%). The mean ISS was 23.6, mostly (76.53%) caused by blunt injury mechanism. MODS occurred in 43 patients (43.87%). The prediction risk score consists of Revised Trauma Score (<7.25) and lactate level ≥2.75 mmol/L. This study also verified several independent risk factors for post-multi-trauma MODS such as ISS >25, presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, shock grade 2 or more, and white blood cells >12,000. Conclusion We derived a novel simple and applicable instrument to predict MODS in adults following multi-trauma. The use of this scoring system may allow early identification of trauma patients who are at risk for MODS and result in more aggressive targeted resuscitation and damage control surgery. Trial registration ISCRTN ISRCTN16661943. 09/11/2016 retrospectively registered. Highlights

Highlights