We have shown that reversal of NMB with sugammadex or neostigmine increased BIS values dependent on the presence of EMG activity. Thus, the effect of muscle activity reappearance during rocuronium NMB reversal spuriously increasing the BIS value should be taken into consideration when relying on BIS monitoring for evaluating propofol/remifentanil recovery.

The authors demonstrated a significant difference in rocuronium potency and duration of action among patients in the three countries. Larger studies are required for determining dosage recommendations for different geographic regions.

This study demonstrates that flumazenil given to healthy unpremedicated patients during propofol/remifentanil anesthesia significantly increased the BIS value and allowed earlier emergence from anesthesia. This may indicate that flumazenil could be used on a case-by-case basis to reverse endogenous or exogenous endozepines that might play a role during anesthesia.

BIS is a useful measure for grading and monitoring the degree of involvement of the central nervous system in patients with chronic liver disease.

Patients undergoing potentially painful interventional radiological procedures generally require a combination of analgesia and sedation. This sedation/analgesia should allow the patient to communicate while also remaining calm. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring could be useful in achieving this. The primary end-point of our study was to compare the percentage time with optimal sedation, defined as Sedation Agitation Scale (SAS) grade 4, between a BIS-guided remifentanil/propofol regimen and a clinically guided regimen in 54 randomly allocated patients. The mean +/- sd percentage time with optimal sedation was significantly longer (P = 0.004) in the BIS group (76.6% +/- 14.7%) than in the SAS group (63.8% +/- 16.4%). There was a significant difference in the weighted mean infusion rates of remifentanil (P = 0.0067) and propofol (P = 0.0075) in the BIS group (0.066 +/- 0.027 microg.kg(-1) . min(-1) 1.59 +/- 0.44 mg.kg(-1) . h(-1)) compared with the SAS group (0.091 +/- 0.036 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) 1.92 +/- 0.43 mg.kg(-1).h(-1)), respectively. BIS values exhibited a temporal correlation to SAS scores (r2 = 0.72). In conclusion, a BIS-guided regimen was more effective than a SAS-guided regimen. The use of BIS resulted in fewer remifentanil and propofol doses. The targeted BIS range of 80-85 provided a sufficient functional level of sedation.